On 2019-01-19 9:12 p.m., Ian! D. Allen wrote:
> :
> 64.233.177.26 failed after I sent the message.
> Remote host said: 550-5.7.1 This message does not have authentication
> information or fails to pass
> 550-5.7.1 authentication checks. To best protect our users from spam, the
> 550-5.7.1 message
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Suddenly it's not.
I've seen the same thing start happening over the past few month with an
organization that forwards my messages to gmail:
:
64.233.177.26 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550-5.7.1 This mes
On 2019-01-19 13:51, Rick Leir wrote:
> Michel
> Sorry, it is not a simple answer. They suggest DKIM, SPF and DMARC for
> authentication, and setting these up will take a bit of effort. It is not
> clear how Google scores an email to block spam, maybe one of the
> authentication systems above would
I had an issue where my domain name provider did not maintain their machine's
reverse DNS in a timely fashion.I am with a different provider now, who also
provides web hosting.
Replies are sent to my email address at echlin.ca and bounce if the email
server at the DNS provider does not have the
Michael,
The reverse DNS is also mentioned in the Google help page. Your reverse DNS
seems to be wrong.
HTH -- Rick
On January 19, 2019 1:02:39 PM EST, "Michael P. Soulier"
wrote:
>So, I help our my sister's business by handling her domain. For some
>time she has paid for a virtual server with
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:02:39 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" wrote:
>- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> tsoul...@gmail.com
> (reason: 550-5.7.1 This message does not have authentication
> information or fails to pass)
> (expanded from: trish)
Most likely SPF
On 2019-01-19 1:51 p.m., Rick Leir wrote:
> Michel
> Sorry, it is not a simple answer. They suggest DKIM, SPF and DMARC for
> authentication, and setting these up will take a bit of effort. It is
> not clear how Google scores an email to block spam, maybe one of the
> authentication systems above w
It might be overkill, but if the business has email requirements that
grow beyond forwarding the mail for a single email address, you might
consider installing mailinabox on that virtual server (or another one).
It will handle the email nicely and the management interface is simple,
so you coul
Michel
Sorry, it is not a simple answer. They suggest DKIM, SPF and DMARC for
authentication, and setting these up will take a bit of effort. It is not clear
how Google scores an email to block spam, maybe one of the authentication
systems above would be adequate. Or maybe they are all required.
So, I help our my sister's business by handling her domain. For some
time she has paid for a virtual server with westhost.com, and on it, I
have a simple forward rule in /etc/aliases for her business account to
her gmail account, as she requested.
trish: tsoul...@gmail.com
petservices: trish
So s
10 matches
Mail list logo