On Fri, October 24, 2008 11:00 am, James wrote:
> sudo apt-get dist-upgrade only tries to upgrade the kernel:
>
> │
> │
> │ You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
> 2.6.18-6-486) │
> │ This will not work unless you have configured your boot loader to
> use initrd.│ │
Hello everyone,
I agree with John. To deal with locally based company is useful (you can
reach them in person...)
If anyone has experience with any Ottawa-based hosting company please share
it!
Nataliya.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:34 PM, John C Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nataliya,
>
>
OCLUG members may find this useful if they need a smallish web site
(10-40MB).
Having been with Magma for better part of a decade, and recently finding
the service with Primus who took them over to be less than stellar, I
sought other options. Since 2003 have had at least one domain name with
sudo apt-get dist-upgrade only tries to upgrade the kernel:
│
│
│ You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
2.6.18-6-486) │
│ This will not work unless you have configured your boot loader t
On Fri, October 24, 2008 10:37 am, Mark Little wrote:
> Did you do an 'apt-get dist-upgrade' after changing the sources? Not
> sure if this is still required but I remember having to do it when
> changing releases around the Potato days.
I tried but it only wanted to upgrade the kernel.
That faile
> Could not execute '/usr/bin/gpgv' to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)
>
> I have:
> /usr/bin/gpg /usr/bin/gpg-convert-from-106 /usr/bin/gpg-zip
> /usr/bin/gpgsplit
>
> but no /usr/bin/gpgv
you need the gpgv package.
http://packages.debian.org/etch/gpgv
I recommend that you upgrade t
On Fri, October 24, 2008 10:21 am, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081024 10:14]:
>
>> On Fri, October 24, 2008 10:07 am, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>>
>>> Let's start with this:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> what does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
>>
>> I replaced:
>> deb http://ftp.
Did you do an 'apt-get dist-upgrade' after changing the sources? Not sure
if this is still required but I remember having to do it when changing
releases around the Potato days.
Cheers,
Mark
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:21:11 -0400, Bart Trojanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * James <[EMAIL PROTEC
* James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081024 10:14]:
> On Fri, October 24, 2008 10:07 am, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> > Let's start with this:
> >
> >
> > what does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
>
> I replaced:
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sarge main
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/upd
On Fri, October 24, 2008 10:07 am, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Let's start with this:
>
>
> what does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
I replaced:
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sarge main
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
with:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable m
Let's start with this:
what does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like?
what does /etc/debian_version say?
what was the release of Debian that was originally installed on this
system?
I am guessing that you have 'stable' or 'testing' in your sources.list
-- as opposed to potato/sarge/etch -- but
I am trying to upgrade an old system that is broken. :-(
I get stuff like this for lots of packages:
dpkg: serious warning: files list file for package `readline-common'
missing, assuming package has no files currently installed.
apt-get is broken and I installed
gnupg_1.4.6-2_i386.deb with dpkg
12 matches
Mail list logo