On 11-05-06 10:01 PM, Jefrrey Moncrieff wrote:
> I have MAN and gcc on Ubuntu(11.04) But then again it was a (upgrade
> build) I could see the reasoning why not to include apache and web
> server stuff. We think it odd but we are developers. Why would any
> end user require Apache. It a Desktop to
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:00:18PM -0400, porpen wrote:
> perhaps
>
> apt-config dump | grep Arch
> (case sensitive)
But only on Debian or Ubuntu...
> If you need to switch the install from i386 to amd64, it's tricky, but doable.
>
> Cheers!
> -Phil
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:20:55PM -040
perhaps
apt-config dump | grep Arch
(case sensitive)
If you need to switch the install from i386 to amd64, it's tricky, but doable.
Cheers!
-Phil
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> every so often, this question comes up -- is there an option with
> "uname"
I have MAN and gcc on Ubuntu(11.04) But then again it was a (upgrade build) I
could see the reasoning why not to include apache and web server stuff. We
think it odd but we are developers. Why would any end user require Apache. It a
Desktop to them
From: "Mike Kenzie"
To: linux@lists.oclug
RPJD> i'm looking at picking up a seriously fast notebook since i plan on
spending a lot of time a) compiling kernels, b) running JAVA, and c)
hosting numerous VMs at the same time.
Have you considered a Eurocom laptop w/ dual SSD? I know Eurocom boasts
"desktop replacement" performance and th
On Friday 06 May 2011 14:53:32 Rick wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:24, Richard Guy Briggs
wrote:
> >> Not quite what you intended, but how about:
> >>file $(which uname)
> >
> > I often do exactly this with '/bin/ls' to tes
--- On Fri, 5/6/11, Paul B. wrote:
> Roland,
> great results, but I'd like to request one clarification:
> did you constrain the hdd benchmark with the same ramdisk
> size as the
> SSD, or did you mess around with the ramdisk size only
> after running the
> comparison test?
Having checked my no
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:24, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
>> Not quite what you intended, but how about:
>> file $(which uname)
>>
>
> I often do exactly this with '/bin/ls' to test the OS bitness.
>
> Another alternative is to use
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 18:24, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Not quite what you intended, but how about:
>file $(which uname)
>
I often do exactly this with '/bin/ls' to test the OS bitness.
Another alternative is to use gcc -dumpmachine ... which is available on all
systems that matter :-
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> every so often, this question comes up -- is there an option with
> "uname" (or perhaps some other command or file) that identifies that a
> 32-bit version of some linux distro has been installed on a 64-bit
> system?
Not quite
every so often, this question comes up -- is there an option with
"uname" (or perhaps some other command or file) that identifies that a
32-bit version of some linux distro has been installed on a 64-bit
system?
rday
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
