The big difference between MMC and SD is that the latter has DRM support.
It sounds as if that Wikipedia article could use some improvements. Who
is up to it?
Thanks -- Rick
On 21/01/2012 11:19 AM, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Flash needs bad-block remapping, block refresh, and write levelling.
> I
On Jan 21, 2012, at 11:19, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Flash needs bad-block remapping, block refresh, and write levelling. In the
> case of a USB attached flash storage these functions clearly get done in
> the USB device... in some sort of "processor" or ASIC.
>
There is definitely intelligence
If you mount the partition readonly, it is probably safe.
Not mounting at all is safer.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DataRecovery
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man8/e2undel.8.html
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man8/debugfs.8.html
Check your own manpages.
It is not
Flash needs bad-block remapping, block refresh, and write levelling. In the
case of a USB attached flash storage these functions clearly get done in
the USB device... in some sort of "processor" or ASIC.
I always thought that MMC/SD devices worked the same.
Are you saying that a SD card does this
'photorec' recovers deleted files - not sure about deleted folders but
you can give it a try
I would recommend you stop using the disk until you have managed to at
least try recovery - the more you use it, the lesser the chances of
recovering deleted files successfully.
--Raj.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2
