On 13/12/26, Peter Sj?berg wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 01:11 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> >
> >> Similar to chroots, I use bind mounts for containers. This is useful
> >> to give all containers access to the same /home or for distributing
> >> /etc/reso
On 12/26/2013 01:11 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>
>> Similar to chroots, I use bind mounts for containers. This is useful
>> to give all containers access to the same /home or for distributing
>> /etc/resolv.conf. The latter is actually a very cool us
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Similar to chroots, I use bind mounts for containers. This is useful
> to give all containers access to the same /home or for distributing
> /etc/resolv.conf. The latter is actually a very cool use case of
> bind mounts... you can bind a file, not jus
Similar to chroots, I use bind mounts for containers. This is useful to
give all containers access to the same /home or for distributing
/etc/resolv.conf. The latter is actually a very cool use case of bind
mounts... you can bind a file, not just a directory.
--
Sent from my Nexus 4.
On Dec 26, 2
On 13/12/26, Strake wrote:
> On 26/12/2013, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > does anyone here use bind mounts on a regular basis, and for what?
>
> Not regular, but I often bind into chroot environments or with HTTP
> servers who won't follow symlinks for security reasons.
Simlarly, I've seen bind mo
On 26/12/2013, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> does anyone here use bind mounts on a regular basis, and for what?
Not regular, but I often bind into chroot environments or with HTTP
servers who won't follow symlinks for security reasons.
___
Linux mailing lis
prepping for teaching a (home-written) course in red hat enterprise
linux admin next month and decided i might as well dig into a few
topics i've never really understood intimately, so i'll be asking
about them over the next few posts. first up -- bind mounts.
does anyone have a *compelling*
