Re: [OCLUG-Tech] optimal choice for filesystem type for SSD drive doing big builds?

2016-01-11 Thread Stephen Gregory
> On 16/01/11, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >> normally, if i was interested in longevity, i'd put the *source* for >> all my builds on the SSD, and leave the generation of build artifacts >> on the regular drive. but at this point, i don't really care. Given the guesstimates in this article you

[OCLUG-Tech] optimal choice for filesystem type for SSD drive doing big builds?

2016-01-11 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i just added (as a second HD in my laptop) a 480G SSD hard drive, on which i want to do fairly sizable builds (kernel, yocto project, etc.). given that it's a fairly sizable drive, it should take that much longer before i wear it out. normally, if i was interested in longevity, i'd put the

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] optimal choice for filesystem type for SSD drive doing big builds?

2016-01-11 Thread Richard Guy Briggs
On 16/01/11, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i just added (as a second HD in my laptop) a 480G SSD hard drive, on > which i want to do fairly sizable builds (kernel, yocto project, > etc.). given that it's a fairly sizable drive, it should take that > much longer before i wear it out. > >

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] as-is

2016-01-11 Thread Rick Leir
And you can point at a box, say 'how much is that with 4g ram and 160g disk', watch the bios at boot, and hand over a few 20's. You are taking a bit of a chance, and can end up with scrap metal, but it worked out for me. One of the guys there cares enough to match up the ram simms for me. Oh,