Re: [OCLUG-Tech] AGM discussion -- location of meetings

2012-03-22 Thread Brett Delmage
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Eric Brackenbury wrote: > Some folks have started to come to meetings only to find the content way > above their knowledge level and so not returned (I know they should have > stayed to push the other brains to share and help). Or maybe they just found the environment unfrien

[OCLUG-Tech] AGM discussion -- location of meetings

2012-03-22 Thread Eric Brackenbury
> Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:00:50 -0400 > From: John C Nash > Subject: [OCLUG-Tech] AGM discussion -- location of meetings > To: linux@lists.oclug.on.ca > Message-ID: <4f6b2282.8060...@uottawa.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >

Re: [OCLUG-Tech] AGM discussion -- location of meetings

2012-03-22 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
I believe the issue of justifying the effort involved in organizing these events would be resolved if people could more easily attend. As it is, quite a few people seem disinclined to attend simply because of the location. The location can stay the same but I think that attendance will remain an is

[OCLUG-Tech] AGM discussion -- location of meetings

2012-03-22 Thread John C Nash
The two topics that seem to have generated most response relating to the future of OCLUG are - specialist vs generalist meeting topics - location of meetings The former is a perennial split, and there is likely no universal resolution, though it is possible -- and definitely part of current Bo