> > > On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > > > Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:41:57PM -0400, ProfJCNash wrote:
> > > When binary is just not enough.
> >
> On 16/05/31, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Binary what? In practice, you can, and will after a
> On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:41:57PM -0400, ProfJCNash wrote:
> When binary is just not enough.
Binary what? In practice, you can, and will after a non-large amount of
time, if using many environments, hit
On 16/05/31, ProfJCNash wrote:
> When binary is just not enough.
/me ^5s jcnash! :D
> On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
slainte mhath, RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\-- ~\
-- \__
To be fair, replacing binary and library management with packaged
solutions is a lot friendlier for the average user, and encourages safer
computer practices (e.g. get new software from your package manager
instead of some random website).
Sincerely,
Adam Saunders, B.A., M.A. Phil., J.D.
Barri
When binary is just not enough.
On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
___
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.oclug.on.ca
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
