You can write a tiny app to grab the IBM cpu id
hack it up a bit and dump it in hostid if you want
how do I grab the IBM cpu id from a C program (which has no root privilege)?
Reinald
On Thursday, 03/28/2002 at 04:35 EST, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I forgot something in my first reply. According to Oliver Benke's SHARE
presentation:
If you need a sizing for Linux for zSeries S/390, ask your IBM
business
partner or sales representative for it. They should have
Try reading the /proc/cpuinfo file.
I've found so far using z/VM and SAF which sets up the linux--vm
connection using IUCV that the IUCV connection takes from 10-20 minutes
and sometimes upto 45 minutes to connect. When it finally connects I see
a message indicating that z/VM fount the IUCV connection waiting and did a
restart.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Ferguson, Neale wrote:
Try reading the /proc/cpuinfo file.
/proc/sysinfo is much better but only available in up-to-date kernels.
Greetings
Oliver Paukstadt
+++LINUX++
+++Manchmal stehe ich sogar nachts auf
Hey, that's neat!
Even has the nuber of processors assigned and the type of hardware.
Too bad it doesn't also have the hardware model. That might be useful
for analysis programs.
Thanks!
Dennis
Ferguson, Neale
Neale.Ferguson@SoftwareA To:
I need a list of some of the companies running LINUX/390. I thought
there used to be one off of linuxvm.org (a survey ?) also IBM used to
have a list. In particular,
I need to know the names of other insurance companies using LINUX/390.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Hey, that's neat!
Even has the nuber of processors assigned and the type of hardware.
Too bad it doesn't also have the hardware model. That might be useful
for analysis programs.
/proc/sysinfo has the complete information available through STSI
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:51:07PM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
Hence my comment about increasing the administrative effort needed. I
don't have _strong_ objections to Red Hat's methods, since obviously it
works. I'm just not convinced it's superior to thinking things out in
advance and
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:48:22AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Red Hat's been doing it since 3.0.3 that I know about.
As you can imagine, it was in days when there weren't a lot of people
sharing data on PCs (servers aside).
In organisations such as those whare mainframes (and midrange)
Is there a VM command to do this?
Doing it on the Linux side results in the same delay..
btw. this is with the 2.4.7 level kernel. My 2.2.19 level does not seem
to have this problem.
Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
Here is some info that I just received that others might find helpful:
SIZE390 Support Program
SIZE390 provides pre-sale processor sizing estimates to IBM sales reps and
business partners for zSeries and S/390 processors running z/OS or OS/390
for the following e-business applications and
On Friday, 03/29/2002 at 07:55 PST, Lionel Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here is some info that I just received that others might find helpful:
SIZE390 Support Program
SIZE390 provides pre-sale processor sizing estimates to IBM sales reps
and
business partners for zSeries and S/390
Greetings;
I guess you mean it is a privileged instruction in linux/390 because it
isn't in VM. This leads to the strange situation where you need to be a
privileged
linux user to issue general user CP commands.
Thanks for that info.
Dennis
Alan Altmark
Can anyone on the list offer any suggestions on resolving segmentation faults (in this
case 11) on Linux systems? Is this a symptom of physical resource constraints (IE.
real memory allocated to an LPAR) or logical constraints (IE. buffer sizes etc.)?
Any suggestions/advice are much
What kernel level made this available? My 2.4.9 system does not have it, so
it must be later than that.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Paukstadt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hostid Value - CPUID
-snip-
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
What kernel level made this available? My 2.4.9 system does not have it, so
it must be later than that.
November last year for 2.4.7:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/current2_4.shtml#nov232001-linux
Report this as a
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Chris Senko wrote:
One of my users got the following message while migrating files to his home
directory:
VFS: file-max limit 8192 reached
We're running SLES7. Can someone tell me what it is, where this limit is
set, and how can I change it? Any good reasons NOT
Thankyou, Neale. Thankyou, Oliver.
I'll give it a try.
Chris
One of my users got the following message while migrating files to his home
directory:
VFS: file-max limit 8192 reached
We're running SLES7. Can someone tell me what it is, where this limit is
set, and how can I change it? Any good reasons NOT to change it?
Thanks,
Chris Senko
sysctl -w fs.fs-max=new value
Place fs.fs-max=newvalue in file /etc/sysctl.conf and have one of your
boot scripts issue the sysctl -p command.
-Original Message-
One of my users got the following message while migrating
files to his home
directory:
VFS: file-max limit 8192
On Friday, 03/29/2002 at 10:27 CST, Dennis G. Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Greetings;
I guess you mean it is a privileged instruction in linux/390 because it
isn't in VM. This leads to the strange situation where you need to be a
privileged linux user to issue general user CP commands.
Ann,
Good luck. You might have been thinking of my Primer presentation
that talks about companies (or individuals at companies) who are
_interested_ in Linux/390. That list was culled from the mailing list
subscribers. No real guarantees that any of them are using it in
production. The one
One of my users got the following message while migrating files to his home
directory:
VFS: file-max limit 8192 reached
We're running SLES7. Can someone tell me what it is, where this limit is
set, and how can I change it? Any good reasons NOT to change it?
On older kernels its a
Neale,
According to both my 2.2.16 and 2.4.9 systems, that should be:
sysctl -w fs.file-max=new value
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VFS: file-max limit 8192 reached
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, John Burnley wrote:
Can anyone on the list offer any suggestions on resolving segmentation
faults (in this case 11) on Linux systems? Is this a symptom of
physical resource constraints (IE. real memory allocated to an LPAR)
or logical constraints (IE. buffer sizes
I am installing a Suse sles7 system under z/VM 3.1 and when it tries to
install the kernel, I get the following error. If I repeat the task, it
just has the same result. The FTP server is another Linux system under VM
(older version).
Any ideas what is wrong?
Thanks,
Jeff Davis
x The command
It doesn't appear that the IBM LCS driver has been built into the RH 7.2 beta
system yet.
I just built a new ramdisk using fresh downloads from the RH beta rawhide
site
and I did not get an active eth0 device at the end of the boot/script.
Just trying to get verification on that.
So, if I go
Well, I can't really do that, since the source tree for the kernel has the
sysinfo.c reference in the Makefile. So, all I can assume is that the
install/boot kernel was built without the fix, and later on the fix was
incorporated. I just rebuilt my kernel from the shipped source, and
rebooted,
To that list you can add:
Codan (Denmark)
North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Prudential
Deutsche Bank Insurance Group
Royal Insurance (UK)
Zurich Life (CH)
Gothaer Insurance (Germany)
Generali (Austria)
American Century
Amica Mutual (Never heard of them)
There are others but
We finally got the warp connection to work. The fix was simple and others have
suggested this in various posts...recompiling module web_app. We
were experiencing problems where the compile would not work (following some of the
directions from various web page sources); but once the
31 matches
Mail list logo
