Please no more speculation on this nonsense. You are all starting to get
suspicious of IBM based on some groundless speculation. It could be that
someone that looks after the publication went to the funny farm and the guy
that took over left the chapter out. Based on my idle speculation I don't
th
Oops, sorry Jay.
Regards, Craig
Gregg C Levine
> > >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/message/16259 is the origina
> l.
> > >> >Tells you more
> > >> >about the Hercules effort in one post than a year of reading would do.
> >
> > FWIW - I tried to read it (and I have a Yahoo groups login,) but
> > apparently it's restricted to me
Samy, Chris,
It's not _guaranteed_ that you'll damage your NTFS file system. I've used
it several times in write mode with no problems, but have had problems on
other occasions. The driver is listed as VERY experimental in write mode,
and deservedly so. To my knowledge, read mode has not cause
> > As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without
> > incrementing the version number, contrary to normal IBM
> > practice), and *all*
> > references to Hercules have been carefully expunged!
> > Anyone with a clue what's going on? Suspicious of rewriting history!
>
> Pure s
Hello from Gregg C Levine writing for myself
Nice post Craig, except for one problem. His name is Jay, not John. But
I won't stun you over it. And nice to see you here, Jay, anyway.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Clearing the decks for a 'Cease and Desist'. IBM can hardly issue
> one if some of its own documentation seems to sanction Hercules. It's
> come a bit late, too - back in Autumn I posted that I expected it in
> mid-February, but I guess lawyers get paid by the hour.
John,
I am not a licensed or practising attorney but I do have legal
qualifications, so I can render an opinion but not for a fee (though I can
for wage to my employer?? because that falls under self representation)!
This is my own personal opinion and I do not purport to represent anyone
else.
Now, now. That excuse worked once/twice before. We're not going to let you
get away with it forever! :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Chris Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: General Linux Question
-snip-
ch
Probably. I think we've helped just about everyone else who wanted to do it
to succeed. Exactly what problems are you seeing, and how are you trying to
install it?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jay Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL
Although I spent most of the day packing and moving from point A to
point Z, I wanted to log on here this evening and take the time to
thank everyone for their suggestions, insights and documentation links
that contributed to me getting the correct CHANDEV parameters for my
environment. I did ge
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: OK who messed with the redbook?
> > If the goal is for IBM to protect the 390 intellectual property, they have
> > to be "vigilant and/or diligent
snip..
>According to Jay's site the product is called: "The Hercules System/370,
>ESA/390, and
>z/Architecture Emulator".
>
>That's three IBM trademarks, right there.
No, that's the *title* of the *page* Phil! It tells you what the page is
about (Hercules) and what that is (it's a System/370, ESA
> We are not looking for a free ride here. If we were running production
> applications, we would have a support contract. I am still at the
> proof of concept stage trying to convince people here there is some merit
> in even evaluating Linux on S/390. There is a lot of resistance to
> introducin
> If the goal is for IBM to protect the 390 intellectual property, they have
> to be "vigilant and/or diligent" in pursuing and enforcing copyright and
> usage of same. If they let this slide, then some other smart lawyer type
I know of no jurisdiction this is the actual case for copyrigh
There is an NTFS module available. If I'm not mistaken, read works pretty well, and
if you want to trash your fs, you can use write. It's been in the works for quite
awhile, but it is apparently very difficult on the write side of things.
Yes, you have to compile the module, and there should
How to access NTFS from Linux?
Is there an easy way to access NTFS File system from SuSe Linux in a dual
boot PC?
Do I have to recompile the kernel to do this?
Thanks,
Samy Rengasamy.
Some people have been commenting about slowness in starting up IUCV
connections to the TCPIP service on z/VM. Some mailing list messages
on this topic include:
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.25123
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.25137
It appears the issue with this i
I had the same problem and I still have the same problem. I tried all
trace/debug options
Tomcat startup just aborts after echoing the classpath and catalina_home
environment variables.
I posted the scenario earlier and have not got a solution working for me.
Samy Rengasamy.
-Original Mes
> It looks like Phil is getting himself quite a bit of mileage out of
> that one flame, isn't he? But then, he'd better, since he worked
> long and hard to harvest it...
The flame itself is of little interest. It looks unoriginal - perhaps derived from
one of the
classic flames stored away on
> >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/message/16259 is the original.
> >> >Tells you more
> >> >about the Hercules effort in one post than a year of reading would do.
>
> FWIW - I tried to read it (and I have a Yahoo groups login,) but
> apparently it's restricted to members of the He
http://lists.linuxppc.org
Regards, Jim
>> > ...
>> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/message/16259 is the original.
>> >Tells you more
>> >about the Hercules effort in one post than a year of reading would do.
FWIW - I tried to read it (and I have a Yahoo groups login,) but
apparently it's restricted to members of the Herc
"Mike Ross" wrote:
[Phil Payne wrote:]
> >He doesn't appear to realise that the original was not
> >only written by one of his Hercules cronies, but it's still in the Hercules
> >archives.
> >
> >Physician heal thyself.
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hercules-390/message/16259 is the origi
> As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without
> incrementing the version number, contrary to normal IBM practice), and *all*
> references to Hercules have been carefully expunged!
Roger Bowler's name has also been removed from the list of contributors. It would be
stran
Hi,
This list (linux-390) is very good (at least I think).
However I´d like to know if someone could point to me a list
for Linux at AS/400
Thanks.
> > Some amusment over on the Hercules list - the 'Linux on S/390' Redbook,
> > SG244987, originally contained a chapter on running Linux on the
>Hercules
> > emulator. Not surprising - it's known to be used by quite a few folks
>inside
> > IBM.
>
>It was, certainly. Is it still?
I've no idea -
> There might be something in that, but it strikes me very much
> as 'locking
> the stable door' if that was the thought process which
> occured: the redbook
> in question has been out for over six months. Pulling the Hercules
> references now seems pointless. Also, if IBM had substantive
> IP con
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:32:30PM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> James Melin wrote:
>
> > If anyone feels like e-mailing me the PDF of the redbook with* the hercules
> > stuff in it, please do.
>
> Try ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/docs/
> or a related mirror site.
ftp://ftp.r
> Some amusment over on the Hercules list - the 'Linux on S/390' Redbook,
> SG244987, originally contained a chapter on running Linux on the Hercules
> emulator. Not surprising - it's known to be used by quite a few folks inside
> IBM.
It was, certainly. Is it still?
> As of (apparently) March
Already been bombed. Just now. So I got it.
Thanks for sending it - whomever that was.
|-+>
| | "Post, Mark K" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | m> |
| | Sent by: Linux on|
|
James,
Feeling particularly like getting mail-bombed today? :) The book is around
5MB in size. Multiply that by a few dozen well-meaning list subscribers...
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
I used the "review this redbook" link to tell them what I thought about the
stealth change. I also mentioned that I hoped "my" redbook would not be the
subject of similar treatment in the future.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:22:09AM -0500, James Melin wrote:
> If anyone feels like e-mailing me the PDF of the redbook with* the hercules
> stuff in it, please do.
You can still download the old version from
ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/s390/docs/sg244987.pdf
Regards,
Stefan Gybas
Donna,
I've run into similar problems in the past when I forget that at system
start time, there's usually no PATH environment variable defined, so the
scripts I write tend to fail. To get more debugging information, you can
put a "set -x" command right after the #!/whatever line you have in the
James Melin wrote:
> If anyone feels like e-mailing me the PDF of the redbook with* the hercules
> stuff in it, please do.
Try ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/docs/
or a related mirror site.
Greg Smith
If anyone feels like e-mailing me the PDF of the redbook with* the hercules
stuff in it, please do.
|-+>
| | Mike Ross|
| | |
| | Sent by: Linux on|
| | 390 Port
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 11:09, James Melin wrote:
>
> Hey Gang. I was wondering what exactly one can do in a native LPAR
> installation of Linux, using the 2.2x kernal
If you are a licensee of FDR, then you can use it to backup pre-2.4
volumes.
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTE
No VM here. I have done this procedure successfully before.
I'm not sure what happened this time though.
-Original Message-
From: Loren Charnley, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't mount root after dasd move
Sand
Sandy,
Looking at this a little closer... The kernel reports a parmfile of:
dasd=33a0,33a1 root=/dev/dasdb1 initrd ro
You say your old parmfile had:
dasd=31A0,31A1 root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
Those don't match is several details, such as the case of the device
numbers, noinitrd vs. initrd, ro mi
> > As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without
> > incrementing the version number, contrary to normal IBM
> > practice), and *all*
> > references to Hercules have been carefully expunged!
> > Anyone with a clue what's going on? Suspicious of rewriting history!
>
>Pure sp
Gustavson, John (ECSS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We are running 2.4.7 kernel, which comes with Apache 1.3.19.
> We moved a Web Application from a Sun box, and all pages
> work, except for the PERL CGI scripts which receive "Internal
> Sever Error" on the
> web page, and
>
> "[Mon Apr 15 10:58:
Marcy (say hi to Rebecca for mw).
I would be very interested in more information on setting up dynamic
routing.
thx
Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead
Kaiser Permanente Information Technology
25 N. Via Monte Ave
Walnut Creek
We are running the vlan with 2.4.7 kernel, and it works great. No problems yet. Be
aware, some SUSE distributions don't have the kernel patch to enable hiper sockets, so
check that before you
install. The 2n'd question is up for debate. I think it is a matter of preference,
which should be
Marcy,
If you would write up the dynamic example, I'd be more than happy to include
it as well. :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux under VM with OSPF Dynamic Routing.
Hi,
We currently have a limited development Linux set-up of 4 guest virtual
machines, running under Z/VM 3.1.0. We use a Suse 2.2.16 kernel / OS/390
gateway IP stack machine with onward connection to Linux machines via
virtual ctcs which are a little unreliable when we have to re logon the
Linux
> As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without
> incrementing the version number, contrary to normal IBM
> practice), and *all*
> references to Hercules have been carefully expunged!
> Anyone with a clue what's going on? Suspicious of rewriting history!
Pure speculation, b
Eric wrote:
>My network colleague would now like to know if anybody has experience of
>running Linux under VM
>with OSPF dynamic routing (GateD). If so, are there any pitfalls and cou
>you possibly provide some
>sample config files ?
We run z/VM 4.2 with Guest Lan and let VM TCPIP do the OSPF
ro
I am running the 2.4.7 kernel, and have the exact same problem. I think it may have
something to due with being started too soon. I was going to put a sleep command in,
just to see if it helped, but
I haven't gotten around to it yet.
Regards
John Gustavson
Enterprise C
We are running 2.4.7 kernel, which comes with Apache 1.3.19. We moved a Web
Application from a Sun box, and all pages work, except for the PERL CGI scripts which
receive "Internal Sever Error" on the
web page, and
"[Mon Apr 15 10:58:39 2002] [error] (2)No such file or directory: exec of /u03/h
Some amusment over on the Hercules list - the 'Linux on S/390' Redbook,
SG244987, originally contained a chapter on running Linux on the Hercules
emulator. Not surprising - it's known to be used by quite a few folks inside
IBM.
As of (apparently) March 21st, the Redbook has been revised (without
Hey Gang. I was wondering what exactly one can do in a native LPAR
installation of Linux, using the 2.2x kernal (I've not gotten the 2.4
distribution) from SuSE to backup their system.
I understand that the 2.4 kernal allows/can allow the s/390 side of the
coin to backup the Linux volumes native
I have installed the tar version of Tomcat 4.03 and want to incorporate it
in the /etc/init.d start up process. I took the skeleton script and
modified it for Tomcat. I can successfully start it manually with the
/etc/init.d/tomcat start command, and stop it with the /etc/init.d/tomcat
stop comm
Sandy,
Is your LINUX running under VM? If so, did you change the minidisk
statements in the directory and make sure that the volumes are in the sys
config and are attached to system when you start?
I moved some of my dasd around a few months ago under VM and didn't have any
problems. It also ve
Sandy,
It might have made a difference that your system was not brought down
cleanly, but I don't know that it caused your problem.
Yes, you can fix your system without reinstalling. Bring up your
installation kernel/ramdisk system. Do an insmod dasd dasd=216A,216B,216C
to get access to your d
Sorry for the typo
Actual:
old = dasd=33A0,33A1 root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
> -Original Message-
> From: Gelbard, Sandy
> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:37 AM
> To: 'Linux on 390 Port'
> Subject: can't mount root after dasd move
>
> Hello again,
>
15.04.2002 17:37:28 "Gelbard, Sandy" wrote:
>1) I updated my parmfile to replace the old ucb's with the new ucb's
>
>old = dasd=31A0,31A1 root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
>
>new = dasd=216A,216B,216C root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
^^
>Command line is dasd=33a0,33a1 root=
Hello again,
I am having difficulty accessing my linux system now that I have moved my
dasd packs.
Here are the facts:
1) I updated my parmfile to replace the old ucb's with the new ucb's
old = dasd=31A0,31A1 root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
new = dasd=216A,216B,216C root=/dev/dasdb1 noinitrd
2) I r
58 matches
Mail list logo
