FYI, my patches to make the Kaffe Java implementation run on Linux/390 have
finally been picked up. What the heck, it's only been two years and an
entire job since then :-)
Ross Patterson
>--- Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: Fwd: Re: Use of Debian machines for
> > regressio
Dave,
I would doubt it. From what I can tell, the concerns Red Hat has with LVM
is unrelated to the kernel level. I would recommend going with the software
RAID0 for now.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:10 PM
To: [
Dave, We are piloting SuSe SLES7 and Oracle 9i on a 9672-R46 (1 IFL), 1GB
real mem. So far, running fine. We have had a bunch of Unix/Linux and
Oracle 8i/9i differences that we have/are fighting. We have databases in
the 20-30gb range, 2GB virt mem. One test went real smooth and we are
compili
I need to setup a multivolume filesystem for an Oracle dbase
is LVM part of redhat now at 2.4.9-37 ??
If not, I'll use raidtools.
Tia
Dave
In a message dated 7/1/2002 4:42:18 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The biggest pain is to format all those 2.2 gb
> disks under Linux to get the required total size.
>
> Anyway, give me a holler off list or on and we can chat.
>
...so are you using LVM to combine those 2
Ich werde ab 01.07.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
12.07.2002.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Adam,
Don't see your problem but we use a mix of z/OS and Linux (SuSE 2.4.17) so
can't exactly match your config.
A few basic questions:
The Linux guest that "owns" the OSA - does this mean the OSA is not shared
at all, and/or have you defined it as PRI router?
Are the Hipersockets addresses add
Thanks, Rob. We will make sure we can tell you what
process is using CPU, I/O, or memory resources.
SNMP does have a lot of good data. It is a good
start. We are getting data from other sources, too.
It also sounds like you don't want continuous
monitoring - using up resources, but would pref
I would also suggest that you have the CE power the Shark off and then
on again before you bring up the mainframe again.
===
Cyrus Mead IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IntelliWare Systems, Inc.
Authors of:
z/Web-Host for native, S/390 web enablement
z/XML-Host for
We have a Web site that uses ORACLE 9i... run the test on VM(IFL)
... sample a 512M gets better result vs 128M with 1G of Vdisk(swap)
.
The VM/ESA performance at SanJose was very good! I miss the
class so much i would like to take it again!
James,
I have found that shutting down all processes on the mainframe while IBM
updates the microcode is the smart choice, less chance of a problem. I also
require that the CE stays on site while I bring all of the systems back up.
Just my .02 worth.
Loren Charnley, Jr.
Tech Support Administra
> Can this live in a Windows NT network domain as a member server?
Yes. Use workgroup= to specify the domain and have them create a domain
account for rockhopper in the appropriate NT domain and give you the domain
account and password they have created.
> Since Windows NT uses NetBIOS as an APP
I would take my Linux/390 systems down. If I had the opportunity, I would
leave up a Linux/390 system that I didn't really care about, so I could see
what happens, for future reference.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002
>binutils to 2.12.1
Not good. Please use version 2.12.90.0.4 and the patch from D-Works.
blue skies,
Martin
Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm attempting to update the glibc on my SLES 2.4.7 kernel in preparation
for upgrading
the kernel to 2.4.17. Prior to this I have updated the following:
binutils to 2.12.1
gcc to 3.1 w/DW patches
Here is what I've done:
tar xzf glibc-2.2.5-s390-may2002.tar.gz
tar xzf glibc-2.2.5.tar.gz
ln -s
IBM is going to apply some microcode changes to our shark dasd box in order
to support the larger capacity drives. This is, I am told, going to make
disk channels go away and come back.
Is linux capable of surviving that process or am I going to get mangled?
re-posting for a Monday audience :o)
I'm working my way through the justification and acquisition of a z800 with
my boss.
It's a slow process..but I think we'll probably get one in the fall!
Anyways...in the meantime...someone from the infrastructure group
wants to put up a 50-150gb Oracle d
I've got a situation where I've got a Linux guest owning an OSA-GigE,
with (virtual) HiperSockets networks routed behind him.
Ping times to the HiperSockets guests are effectively instantaneous.
If I ssh to the guest with the Gig-E and then SSH to the guests behind
him, *that* interaction is ins
"TRYING TO TAKE its computing on demand initiative a giant step forward, IBM
on Monday rolled out an Internet-based service that allows Linux users to
access the amount of processing power and other technical resources they
need on a utility basis.
"The new on-demand service, called Linux Virtual
Or you can switch path to another LPAR then switch it back.
WBR, Sergey
"Post, Mark K"
cc:
Sent by: Linux Subject: Re: SuSE Kernel 2.4.7 Tapes
on 390 Port
<[EMAIL
> From: "Ferguson, Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Linux heads for the mainframe limelight
> See: "http://www.vnunet.com/Features/1133059";
Huh. "It's gonna take three years". OK - I can grok that. I think less than that,
but so
what?
http://www.zdnet.com.au/itmanager/trends/story/0,
See: "http://www.vnunet.com/Features/1133059";
22 matches
Mail list logo
