This discussion has brought CDL to my attention and prompts me to ask
which combination of CDL/LDL and partitioning/non-partitioning is recommended.
Bob Matthews,
University of Geneva.
- Original Message -
From: "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 03:51, John Summerfield wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 04:38, you wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 18:26, John Alvord wrote:
> > > I seem to remember that 64-bit byte order was somewhat of a
> > > challenge... Linux worked on alpha just fine, but 390x used a
> > > different byt
Yes, that's what I ended up doing and all is well.
-Original Message-
I think that an fs full situation may occur in your case, have you tried a
sleep after the rm? My systems behaves the same, and frequent df displays
after the rm of a large file show an increaing amount of freespace.
Yes. Of cause, I mounted disk under root.
And when i executed mount with conv=ebcdik i even can read normal text.
Like:
sk@zlinux:/mnt/tmp/SYS2.PARMLIB > cat CLOCK00
OPERATOR NOPROMPT
TIMEZONE E.02.00.00
ETRMODE NO
ETRZONE NO
ETRDELTA 1
WBR, Sergey
"Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROT
I think that an fs full situation may occur in your case, have you tried a
sleep after the rm? My systems behaves the same, and frequent df displays
after the rm of a large file show an increaing amount of freespace.
Jan Jaeger
>From: "Ferguson, Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Linux on 3
