On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Lionel,
>
> >From the end-user's perspective, it's better if they don't have to change
> anything on their end. If you turn off a Windows server, and fire it up on
> Linux/390 with the same netbios name, when the users come in on Monday, if
> everything
Lionel,
>From the end-user's perspective, it's better if they don't have to change
anything on their end. If you turn off a Windows server, and fire it up on
Linux/390 with the same netbios name, when the users come in on Monday, if
everything was done right, they shouldn't notice anything differ
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:21:06AM -0500, Jeremy Warren wrote:
> Does anyone know of a simple/quick way to setup a GUARANTEED read-only
> access to a linux guest?
>
> Maybe some type of read-only telnet/ssh daemon? I couldn't find a switch
> to either of them.
What you need is a limited user and
Jeremy,
You're a little too vague (for me) about what you mean by "so they can look
at an application." Do you mean you want to be able to demo something for
them? Do you only want to allow them to see the output of the application?
(In that case, generating HTML output and having them point the
When doing a file/print server consolidation using Samba what is the
recommended approach?
Is it better to do a one for one (windows server to linux samba server) or
to take some number of windows servers into a single samba server?
thx
Tar or RSYNC work
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Abdullah Al-humaid wrote:
> How would you go about backing up the linux server if
> there wasn't one. One idea I can
