On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 05:00:10 -0600, Phil Howard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:51:43PM -0600, Lucius, Leland wrote:
>
>| > > For instance, calling BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress() would
>| > require you
>| > > to reserve the standard 96 bytes, plus 8 more since it has 7
>|
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:19:11 +0300 Tzafrir Cohen said:
>On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:19:05PM +0200, Phil Payne wrote:
>
>> Good email clients can be configured to omit these responses to list mail.
>> Perhaps it would help if the Linux mailing list set some of the headers,
>> such as "Precedence: lis
That's basically what I meant. While 80MIPS will do a heck of a lot under OS/390 or
z/OS,
when normally considering UNIX, it isn't all that much.
Unless of course, you consider that the processor is NOT doing I/O on a mainframe,
or managing a memory mapped display, or ... well, you get the pictur
domain is littlerock
and dns is 10.37.1.26
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: samba
Is nmbd running? That can sometimes cause this problem, but I wouldn't
expect "start run \\zvmlinx1"
It's not that Linux for S/390-zSeries itself requires that much horsepower, it
depends on what you want to run on it. For web sites, web application
serving, database, file & print functions, email and a number of other tasks
it really does a great job.
The problem is when folks try to compare a
On Sad, 2003-04-05 at 18:52, Noll, Ralph wrote:
> so.. does linux require that much horsepower...???
How long is a piece of string. It depends what you do with it.
Some things like java, and compilers can be really CPU intensive
On Iau, 2003-04-03 at 13:51, Esthon Medeiros wrote:
> Also you can use Webmin for many administrative tasks.
Also gnome is still WM independant.
so.. does linux require that much horsepower...???
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Paul,
That's the whole point. The GP on a 0A1 is 80 MIPS, not 192. An IFL that
gets added to the b
Actually, I did not have this reference, which explains a LOT. People told me to look
at this reference,
but did I listen (*sigh*)
Thank you for pointing me to it and getting my attention enough to make me read it. It
answers a LOT of
questions. And you example of calling functions answered
Paul,
That's the whole point. The GP on a 0A1 is 80 MIPS, not 192. An IFL that
gets added to the box would run at 192, but not the GP.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Paul Raulerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 12:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
H
Also you can use Webmin for many administrative tasks.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 01:47:27PM -0600, McKown, John wrote:
>
>> There is an X Window manager that runs on Win2K?
>
> Usually the X server comes with a "native window manager" mode, that
> allows y
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:51:43PM -0600, Lucius, Leland wrote:
| > > For instance, calling BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress() would
| > require you
| > > to reserve the standard 96 bytes, plus 8 more since it has 7
| > > parameters. So:
| > >
| > > LR15,Stkptr Get
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:29:00PM -0800, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
| Mainframe Linux isn't trying to be a racecar, but more like a semi.
| Don't use it for compute-intensive jobs, but for consolidating
| capacity and doing heavy I/O jobs.
How well would it perform for compute plus I/O combination,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:20:29PM -0500, Rod Clayton wrote:
[snip]
> ss390:/var/log/samba# ls
> smb.log
> ss390:/var/log/samba#
No nmb.log? no other logs at all? is nmbd running?
Do you use the standard version of samba from the distro?
--
Tzafrir Cohen +
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:57:32PM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Rod,
>
> You might need something like this:
> browseable = Yes
> guest account = nobody
> map to guest = Bad User
Or, a more direct approach:
security = share
This makes samba behave more like win9x instead of winnt/2k: not worry
> I would add to this: very fast context switching between tasks.
Not a nitpick, but a refinement - /390 is not especially good at context switching,
but it is
supreme at switching BACK. If a task is redispatched on the same processor, it's a
matter of
a few cycles until it looks like it was ne
16 matches
Mail list logo
