Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
HI all!
I am Installing SAP release 4.6D under Linux SuSe Interprise server 8 and I get the
following error when running R3SETUP or INSTGUI "Can't locate module binfmt-4c46". I
have gcc version 3.2, glibc-2.2.5-87, and SuSe kernel Linux version 2.4.19-3suse-SMP.
Please asssist Moloko
Moloko Mo
On Thursday 11 September 2003 12:14, Moloko Monyepao wrote:
> I am Installing SAP release 4.6D under Linux SuSe Interprise server 8 and
> I get the following error when running R3SETUP or INSTGUI "Can't locate
> module binfmt-4c46". I have gcc version 3.2, glibc-2.2.5-87, and SuSe
> kernel Linux v
The following is the output of the uname -a command
Linux lnx1 2.4.19-3suse-SMP #1 SMP Wed Nov 6 22:34:43 UTC 2002 s390 unknow
Moloko Monyepao
OS390/L390 System Programmer
arivia.kom
Tel : +27 11 800 3372
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnd Bergmann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 Septe
Anyone tried BMC's Deployment Manager? How's it compare to Levanta?
Thanks
Gene
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/03 06:27PM >>>
We're using Levanta. Started with version 1 and are now using version
2.
Currently have a few production Version 1 instances. In 3 weeks we
have
some mission-critical Li
On the bootable CD images from SuSE for rel 7.2, where you can load from
the HMC..., there is a problem on disk 1 with the kernel not supporting
3390-9's - but the patch CD, disk 3, has a kernel that will handle them. If
I were to copy these images to disk can I put the correct kernal in and
burn m
Your linux is 32bit, but SAP required 64bit (s390x).
WBR, Sergey
Moloko Monyepao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.09.2003 14:54
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Can't l
>I know to change all the device numbers to their corresponding deviuces,
>but root= parameter?do I leave it as /dev/dasdb1 and run zipl, or do I
>change it to /dev/dasdg1 for the running of zipl. I just wanna make sure
>the boot record goes to the right place.
I install to dasda, root is dasda1.
I'm interested in ideas on how to structure a billing/chargeback system for
webservers running on Linux390.
Thank you.
Traditionally this is done through machine utilization information that
is logged by VM's accounting facility. Some value is assigned to a unit
of work (a CPU second) and machines that are to be charged back have
their accounting information tracked and billed to the user/customer.
The accounting
CA-JARS being one of the packaged chargeback solutions.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Web Server Chargeback/Cost Recovery Methods
Traditionally this is done through machine uti
Or VM:Account.
- Original Message -
From: "Ward, Garry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: Web Server Chargeback/Cost Recovery Methods
> CA-JARS being one of the packaged chargeback solutions.
I have not looked too hard for a chargeback mechanism. We use Apache's
virtual host mechanism to provide multiple websites in one linux instance.
None of them are really large enough to collect money from. If we did have
to charge one particular customer, our plan is to give them their own linux
in
The cpint device driver includes a "device" which creates VM accounting
records. You can take the bsd accounting records that Linux can generate (or
any other means) and use the driver to write them out for VM to consolidate
and centrally report upon.
See the HOW-TO in cpint-1.1.5 that's on linuxv
You're trying to run a module built for a different CPU architecture. Check
and make certain you have the version for your architecture.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Moloko Monyepao
>
> I am
Thanks for the feedback.
If I might add a little more...
We're presented with the challenge of equitable billing to our clients that
have applications running on WebSphere. Ideally, they want to see a flat
rate presented to them
on a periodic basis (monthly, quarterly, etc) for planning/budgetin
> That's far from reality for us and
> very likely
> others as well. So we try to add the usage factor in the mix
> to be fair to
> everyone. Current thinking is that we could establish some
> base rate or
> 'entry fee' to cover some amount of fixed costs regardless of
> the number of
> apps and
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/09/10/HNtorvaldssco_1.html
18 matches
Mail list logo