On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:52:49PM -0400, Alex deVries wrote:
> Ferguson, Neale wrote:
> >Over the past day or so I've been building things like binutils, gcc, and
> >glibc for a 2.6 kernel I've built on s390. One of the problems I encounter
> >is something minor may go wrong with a build using "rp
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 01:51:37AM -0500, Lucius, Leland wrote:
> Anybody know of a simple way of piping data from an LPD server to an SFTP
> server? I've banged together a simple filter that "works", but I was just
> wondering if I even need to do that.
An sftp server is actually an ssh server.
On Monday 22 September 2003 23:06, Richard Troth wrote:
> As one of my colleagues pointed out, this is a job for NSS!
> With an NSS-resident /usr, everyone would get it read-only.
> The "owner" Linux instance would define a new NSS when needed,
> fill it with current content, and then 'saveseg'
As one of my colleagues pointed out, this is a job for NSS!
With an NSS-resident /usr, everyone would get it read-only.
The "owner" Linux instance would define a new NSS when needed,
fill it with current content, and then 'saveseg', at which point
all in-use copies would go CLASS P and be purg
Or you could buy something - Levanta is one example.
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
> Others have already explained that for simple sharing of
> minidisks, _all_
> systems need to have the file system mounted read-only. I
> just wanted to
> point out that NFS, as well as [Open]GFS c
I'm trying to configure SuSE SLES8 to use DHCP and at boot-time I'm getting:
qeth: Trying to use card with devnos 0xC00/0xC01/0xC02
qeth: Device 0xC00/0xC01/0xC02 is an OSD Express card (level: f4f0)
with link type Gigabit Eth (portname: VMLAN2)
> Others have already explained that for simple sharing of
> minidisks, _all_
> systems need to have the file system mounted read-only. I
> just wanted to
> point out that NFS, as well as [Open]GFS can be used if you
> need read-write
> access by any system. I believe AFS could be used in the sam
Phil,
Others have already explained that for simple sharing of minidisks, _all_
systems need to have the file system mounted read-only. I just wanted to
point out that NFS, as well as [Open]GFS can be used if you need read-write
access by any system. I believe AFS could be used in the same way.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:48:33 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>Microsoft still offers Virtual PC, and the current version still runs OS/2,
>but all references to OS/2 have now been deleted from the latest versions of
>the program documentation and online help files.
>
I haven't checked the documentation
Microsoft still offers Virtual PC, and the current version still runs OS/2,
but all references to OS/2 have now been deleted from the latest versions of
the program documentation and online help files.
For those of us still interested in running OS/2, Serenity Systems now
offers a "follow-on" to
>From a function perspective, the VMWare API is fairly limited. It provides
the ability to activate and deactivate images, and some very limited
reconfiguration functions (mostly adding and deleting predefined resources).
I would liken it to controlling a device via SNMP -- very formalized, and
som
FYI, and maybe you know this, Microsoft bought Connectix a few months ago,
and the product is now called Microsoft Virtual PC. Connectix also
developed an 'enterprise' level virtualization product called Virtual Server
which runs on Intel, and which is designed to compete with VMWare ESX.
Microsof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 22 September 2003 09:07, Little, Chris wrote:
> you will probably have to ipl the guests that share the filesystem.
> because of our change control, it's rare that we update /usr so the other
> guests mount it read-only.
Actually, you have
you will probably have to ipl the guests that share the filesystem. because
of our change control, it's rare that we update /usr so the other guests
mount it read-only.
this is one reason why i'm up at 2:07am . . . weekend changes. o fun.
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Hodgson [ma
Has anyone any experience of sharing /usr using vm?
I want to try and use this on our increasing number of production SuSE
platforms.
I have tried an experiment and all went well but I noticed that any update
made on the owning system was not propagated to the sharing systems. I
presume this is b
15 matches
Mail list logo
