Re: OT: Intel gets virtualization clue?

2003-10-06 Thread Jim Elliott
Having read the article, while interesting (and important), Intel's Vanderpool is scarcely the "one of the decade's most significant breakthroughs in computer technology". IBM mainframes since 1981 have had a function known as "Interpretive Execution" which is used the same way. On October 21, 198

Re: OT: Intel gets virtualization clue?

2003-10-06 Thread Jim Elliott
> Hmmm, now Intel is figuring out that virtualization can be made > easier with hardware. When was the SIE paper in R&D Journal, 1991? > http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns4215 Volume 30 Issue 1 of the IBM Systems Journal (1991) ESA/390 interpretive-execution architecture, foundat

OT: Intel gets virtualization clue?

2003-10-06 Thread Mike Grundy
Hmmm, now Intel is figuring out that virtualization can be made easier with hardware. When was the SIE paper in R&D Journal, 1991? http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns4215 - Mike

SGI looks for copied code

2003-10-06 Thread Phil Payne
http://www.itworld.com/Man/2685/031006sgisco/ I can't see anything on SGI's site, though. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803

Re: WebLogic Server 8.1 SP1 Available

2003-10-06 Thread Jim Rich
The staging group for the trial download site says "within two weeks" of the submittal date, which was 9/30/03. I'm told your BEA rep can get it for you from an internal download site immediately, however. Sorry for the delay. Jim On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:09, Biggs, Eric J [ITS] wrote: > Do yo

Re: RE : Virtual hipersocket

2003-10-06 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 02:53, Monteleone wrote: > Thanks Adam, > > That solves my problem but i don't understand why I have to do a COUPLE command for > TCPIP, because SPECIAL order is enough for all other linux guest. Does the SPECIAL statement in TCPIP's directory entry couple him to the Guest L

Re: WebLogic Server 8.1 SP1 Available

2003-10-06 Thread Biggs, Eric J [ITS]
Do you know when it will be available for download? It doesn't seem to be there yet. Eric Biggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jim Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WebLogic Server 8.1 SP1 Available WebLogi

Re: RE : Virtual hipersocket

2003-10-06 Thread Dennis Musselwhite
Greetings, On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 03:40, Monteleone wrote: > Iʼve got some troubles with my guest lan definition. Every linux guest > can work together thru that lan, but nobody can reach the guest TCPIP. > TCPIP is able to ping himself but nobody else thru that lan. > Any idea ? Thanks in ad

Re: RE : Virtual hipersocket

2003-10-06 Thread Rob van der Heij
Monteleone wrote: That solves my problem but i don't understand why I have to do a COUPLE command for TCPIP, because SPECIAL order is enough for all other linux guest. When you define the SPECIAL with the name of the Guest LAN, the couple happens automagically (provided the Guest LAN exists alre

RE : Virtual hipersocket

2003-10-06 Thread Monteleone
Thanks Adam, That solves my problem but i don't understand why I have to do a COUPLE command for TCPIP, because SPECIAL order is enough for all other linux guest. Best Regards, Gerard MONTELEONE Ingenieur Systeme & Reseau ( 04.95.23.68.09 / 06.87.72.70.32 S.I.TE.C zi du Vazzio