Thanks. A while ago, I downloaded hostbridge.com files that contained
socket code in assembler and COBOL. Both do a HTTP GET to any web page and
return the contents. For me to do this in CICS, some CSKL (?) transaction
needs to be running and ports need to be configured. It is never simple on
the m
I have a few questions accumulated, although I'm sure there will be
more. I suspect they're in the category of either:
A - this is a really stupid question, or
B - we've already answered this 1,000 times
My questions so far are:
1. Problem installing
When I went through the Debian installer, I go
Leland,
I'd love a copy!
- Alex
Lucius, Leland wrote:
I have a standard (non-CICS) sockets example in have Cobol and Rexx. Hollar
if ya want 'em.
Leland
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ranga Nathan
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:15 P
I have a standard (non-CICS) sockets example in have Cobol and Rexx. Hollar
if ya want 'em.
Leland
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Ranga Nathan
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Accessin
I have downloaded this but looks like it requires "Enterprise Extender" on
the OS/390 side.
I was looking at the CICS sockets interface. On the Linux side I can rig
up something in Perl easily. But the CICS side seems to be a big effort.
If anyone has done sockets on CICS, can I have some pointers
As a subscriber to both lists I would say the answer is YES. :)
The answers you get on the debian-s390 list appear to assume more
knowledge about debian than the answers on this list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian does indeed have a lot of goodness.
If I were interested in asking some relative
Well, you've already spent more time trying to figure this out than you
would if you just do a re-install. So, why not try to "do it right" all the
way through so you _know_ for sure what you've got on your hands? (I sure
wouldn't want to inherit a system that had been glued back together from da
Mark, I did not run fdasd to partition the 151 disk. I didn't think I needed to
if I was only going to have a single partition. Both the 150 & the 151 mdisks
are on the same volume. 150 is supposed to be 150 cyls, and 151 is supposed to
be 2560 cyls.
The zeros at address 0 bother me too. I was exp
Thank you Rob, this looks like something I need. I hope you don't mind, but
I'd like to email you privately for more info and a little help, since it
looks like I'm going to also have to install cms pipelines along with vmarc
and I don't know what else.
Sue
Rob van der Heij wrote:
> As far as fo
Hmm, that's because it's stored in base64 encoding. If you can't decode it,
go to http://linuxvm.org/archives/200203.html, and do a find on "tape."
You'll see a summary of what was posted in Sergey's email.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] B
Sue,
/dev/dasdb1 looks more to be the size of a swap partition than a data
partition. 127776 1K blocks comes out to about 125MB. The 150 disk is about
140MB in size, also small enough to be a swap disk.
Yes, -cdl is the default for dasdfmt these days. When you ran fdasd (you
_did_ run fdasd, ri
Coming to a zExpo soon -- I plan to give a talk on it. The next outing is in
Europe, but hopefully we'll be in Orlando to talk about it as well.
There is a fair amount of info on amanda.org, all of which applies to Amanda
on zLinux. The sticky bit is the interaction between Linux and drive
allocat
> If Amanda gets ported to the Windows platform, then a shop
> that doesn't want
> or need all of the fancy/expensive features of Tivoli Storage
> Manager could
> have a much cheaper alternative.
Already has been done.
Contact me off line for details and support information...8-)
-- db
I have been reading through this for a few minutes now.
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
/Thomas Kern
/301-903-2211
> -Original Message-
> From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 16:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Use of 3490 tape
DOE is a windows desktop shop. If it doesn't look and feel and crash like a
windows program it will not get into our Common Operating Environment
(single desktop image pushed to users).
But now I know I can get rid of my Tivoli client when I get a Linux/390
Amanda server running.
/Thomas Kern
/30
Is there a body of practical experience or primer about amanda and how it
can be used with z/linux?
|-+>
| | "Kern, Thomas" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | oe.gov> |
| | Sent by:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:08:10PM -0500, Kern, Thomas wrote:
> If Amanda gets ported to the Windows platform, then a shop that doesn't want
> or need all of the fancy/expensive features of Tivoli Storage Manager could
> have a much cheaper alternative.
Er, I hate to break it to you, but
If y
If Amanda gets ported to the Windows platform, then a shop that doesn't want
or need all of the fancy/expensive features of Tivoli Storage Manager could
have a much cheaper alternative.
Federal budget crunching is around the corner, and Tivoli could be a nice
target for cutting.
/Thomas Kern
/301
Hi Mark, I ipl'ed from the VM reader, and I'm pretty sure I copied the right
files from the cd since I just about followed the Suse install instructions word
for word. The one thing I did not do was to specify "-d cdl" on the dasdfmt
command because I thought it was supposed to be the default. It's
>
> I *did* ask for volunteers before Xmas ...8-)
>
I would have too if I'd been around. Finally had some vacation. But, if
I'd seen the invite I'd have certainly done it during the vacation. This
the FUN kind of stuff.
> If you already have the prereqs, it's pretty slick. The one
> difficult p
Feature.
If you want to interleave the use of multiple swap files you set the priorites
to be the same.
If you want to use swap mutliple swap files in some sort of preferred order
(e.g. use a VDISK swap first, a swap partition second, a swap file third,
etc) you set the priority of each appropria
> > Yes, but it's not very efficient. Check out
> > http://sinenomine.net/publications/presentations.php#2004
> for my MVMUA
> > presentation on a way to make use of VM and/or
> > z/OS-controlled tape w/o
> > having to attach the drives directly to the Linux system.
> >
> Ah man...I wish this was d
Thank you for your response. I found what I was looking for in Device Drivers and
Installation Commands book. It works. I agree it is a little clunky, especially when
needing multiple tapes
I did notice that I had to "mknod /dev/ntibm0 c 254 0", "mknod /dev/rtibm0 c 254 0"
and "mknod /de
>
> Yes, but it's not very efficient. Check out
> http://sinenomine.net/publications/presentations.php#2004 for my MVMUA
> presentation on a way to make use of VM and/or
> z/OS-controlled tape w/o
> having to attach the drives directly to the Linux system.
>
Ah man...I wish this was done b4 the hol
Yes, but it's not very efficient. Check out
http://sinenomine.net/publications/presentations.php#2004 for my MVMUA
presentation on a way to make use of VM and/or z/OS-controlled tape w/o
having to attach the drives directly to the Linux system.
The approach in the presentation also allows non-VM g
Seems to work for me...
tux:~ # free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 57112 55824 1288 0672 2116
-/+ buffers/cache: 53036 4076
Swap: 16 83144 81300
tux:~ # cat /proc/swaps
Filena
Activate the boot service to call sysctl -p at boot:
chkconfig -a boot.sysctl
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sammons
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [L
Try:
sysctl -w kernel.hz_timer=0
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Eric Sammons
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Problem with sysctl and hz_timer on SLES8
>
>
> I am trying to set my SLES8 gue
Issue the command 'sysctl -p' after boot ( /etc/rc.d/boot.local).
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:04, Eric Sammons wrote:
> I am trying to set my SLES8 guest up to have hz_timer set to 0 at boot. I
> have found that this can be done using sysctl.conf or dynamically by
> sysctl kernel.hz_timer=0. Howeve
I am trying to set my SLES8 guest up to have hz_timer set to 0 at boot. I
have found that this can be done using sysctl.conf or dynamically by
sysctl kernel.hz_timer=0. However, it seems that the sysctl
kernel.hz_timer=0 command does not work.
See the following:
sysctl kernel.hz_timer
kernel.hz
As far as formatting the disks before doing YaST, it's probably time for
a shameless plug again.
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?CMS2CDL
"The CMS2CDL program takes a minidisk that has been formatted by the
CMS FORMAT command and modifies it such that it looks like a disk that
DId you try that link Mark?
Looks like:
DQoxMi4wMy4yMDAyIDE1OjI5OjI0IExpbnV4IG9uIDM5MCBQb3J0IM7B0MnTwcwowSk6DQoNCkhl
bGxvIEppbSENCg0KWW91IGFyZSBhbG1vc3QgcmlnaHQuIEkgbG9vayBhdCBzb3VyY2UgY29kZSBh
bmQgZm91bmQsIHRoYXQNCg0KbWlub3IgbnVtYmVyIDAgZm9yIHJld2luZGluZywNCm1pbm9yIG51
bWJlciAxIGZvciBub24tcmV
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:54:45AM -0800, Jim Sibley wrote:
> All the swap space needs to be the same priority.
> Otherwise, Linux only uses the first swap space.
> Feature or bug?
??
As far as I can tell, if you add different swap spaces at different
priorities, you go to the second after you ex
George Wallace wrote:
:
> I have not seen much reply to your question but have similar issues.
> Can someone tell me if there are more options available to satisfy
> Ranga's post or is this area still a little weak along the lines of
> a mature os/390 -to- Linux/390 link?
:
>> We have a CI
David,
Take a look at http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.24500.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Booher
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Use of 3490 tape
Can 3490 tape drive
Feature. That's what "priority" means, after all. Use "this one" first,
then "that one," then "all these."
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim
Sibley
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Adding
All the swap space needs to be the same priority.
Otherwise, Linux only uses the first swap space.
Feature or bug?
=
Jim Sibley
RHCT, Implementor of Linux on zSeries
"Computer are useless.They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Fina
Can 3490 tape drives be recognized by Linux/390? Up until now, I've been doing VM DDR
backups of my volumes while Linux is down. I was wondering if there was a way to tar
Linux directories directly to a 3490 tape. If so, what /dev devices are used.
Thanks,
David Booher, Systems Programmer
De
> Well, if you're not paying for support *anyway*why not just install
> Debian over the network?
>
> You get a much more recent kernel, actual security updates, all kinds of
> good stuff.
>
> Adam
We are about to begin migrating our guests to SLES 8, which we do have
support for. We are still
On Iau, 2004-02-05 at 17:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 05 February 2004 16:01, Michael Lambert wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > I've been attempting to compile the 2.4.21 kernel with the latest
> > patches from the june 2003 stream, as well as the 2.4.23 kernel with the
> > experimental
Rick,
That configure statement needs to have at least "--enable-__cxa_atexit"
added to it, or gcc 3.x won't generate correct code for C++. This was
pointed out to me by the guys in Boeblingen almost a year ago. Pointing it
out in turn to Patrick Volkerding got me a mention in his Changelog. :)
In the copy of SLES8 I just received, the procedure you gave is documented in the
README file on the first CD.
Robert P. Nixinternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mayo Clinic phone: 507-284-0844
RO-CE-8-857page
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:10:37AM -0500, Alex deVries wrote:
> Debian does indeed have a lot of goodness.
>
> If I were interested in asking some relatively basic Debian-s390
> questions (like: how do I update my s390-tools so that fdasd actually
> works?), would this be the right place? Or shoul
On Thursday 05 February 2004 16:01, Michael Lambert wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> I've been attempting to compile the 2.4.21 kernel with the latest
> patches from the june 2003 stream, as well as the 2.4.23 kernel with the
> experimental patches.
Yes, that's a trivial bug which gcc-3.x happen to i
> I was afraid of that. Anyone have any tips of how to roll your own GCC rpm
> (& glibc & binutils)? I'm feeling the pain of running an unsupported distro.
Strictly speaking, you don't need an RPM.
And if you're going to "roll your own GCC", as you indicated:
# find some space, about 2
I am working on the same issue but I think using CICS sockets might be a more direct
method to xfer the data than USS. The LU6.2 interface could relay the data stream via
http over to the Linux side.
You could even have CICS use an FTP client to open 2 socket (CONTROL) connections to
two dif
Hi Sue,
I had the same symptoms when I was installing SLES 8. It appears that when
Yast was formatting the partitions that it was not doing it correctly. To
get around the problem, this is what I did:
1. Start the installation process, and when yast comes up, go to the 'DASD
Module Parameter S
[I changed the subject line since the thread has forked.]
> Again, I'm not sure what's going on with you and 2.4.24. It built just fine
> for me, but we might be using different configuration options.
Found it!
It's the same error for me
as what you had on 2.4.21 back in September.
> Wait, I ju
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:10:37AM -0500, Alex deVries wrote:
> Debian does indeed have a lot of goodness.
>
> If I were interested in asking some relatively basic Debian-s390
> questions (like: how do I update my s390-tools so that fdasd actually
> works?), would this be the right place? Or shou
I wouldn't mind seeing the question asked both places. (I don't mind
reasonable cross-posting. :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alex deVries
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: compile f
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Vic Cross wrote:
> This is indeed possible; there are switches that let you point out a
> specific module tree and/or symbol table (-b, -F). I thought that the
> depmod invoked after a make modules_install was run that way, but from
> what you're saying that's not the case...
Debian does indeed have a lot of goodness.
If I were interested in asking some relatively basic Debian-s390
questions (like: how do I update my s390-tools so that fdasd actually
works?), would this be the right place? Or should I ask them on the
debian-s390 list?
- Alex
Adam Thornton wrote:
On
Michael,
What I've done in the past for things like this is download the SUSE SRPM
for a package, and modify the .spec file to match the corresponding Red Hat
SRPM for their Intel platform. I use the SUSE SRPM as the base, since they
have a unified code base, so all the Linux/390 patches are incl
Amen.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alex deVries
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: compile failures for the 2.4.21 and 2.4.23 kernels
What distro are you using?
My suggestion for buil
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:46:58AM -0600, Michael Lambert wrote:
> I was afraid of that. Anyone have any tips of how to roll your own GCC rpm
> (& glibc & binutils)? I'm feeling the pain of running an unsupported distro.
Well, if you're not paying for support *anyway*why not just install
Debia
What distro are you using?
My suggestion for building somewhat more involved packages is first to
try to get them to build without RPM, and then work on packaging. It's
much easier to fix and resume building outside of rpmbuild.
- Alex
Michael Lambert wrote:
Yes, I ran into this.
You're using
> Yes, I ran into this.
>
> You're using GCC 2.95.
>
> The kernel notes claim you need to use at least 3.2.
>
> I got it to work (Debian) with GCC 3.0.
>
> Adam
I was afraid of that. Anyone have any tips of how to roll your own GCC rpm
(& glibc & binutils)? I'm feeling the pain of running an unsup
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:01:14AM -0600, Michael Lambert wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> I've been attempting to compile the 2.4.21 kernel with the latest
> patches from the june 2003 stream, as well as the 2.4.23 kernel with the
> experimental patches.
>
> Both kernels break during the compile proc
Hello, everyone.
I've been attempting to compile the 2.4.21 kernel with the latest
patches from the june 2003 stream, as well as the 2.4.23 kernel with the
experimental patches.
Both kernels break during the compile process in the same spot. Here is
a sample of the output:
make[2]: Entering dir
Here's the response I got from Suse on my question about Bastille:
many thanks for your enquiry to SuSE S/390 support.
You wrote:
> As part of our evaluation of SLES8 as an internet-facing platform, I attempted
> to run the RPM-provided "bastille" against our standard-build server.
> [..]
Unfor
*/WAVV 2004/*
April 30 - May 4, 2004
VSE, VM and Linux on zSeries
Education at its best
Over 100 sessions featuring the most knowledgeable Instructors in
the Industry
Hotel $89 and Registration only $300
Two Free Lunches
Hospitality Suite every night
Held over a weekend t
G'day Mark,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Post, Mark K wrote:
> The only way that I can see to avoid that would be to have the
> ability to point depmod to the new kernel, and have it figure things out
> from there.
This is indeed possible; there are switches that let you point out a
specific module tree
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web pag
63 matches
Mail list logo
