Vic Cross wrote:
I had to do this once, but do you think I can remember how? :)
Either with NETSTAT CP or with SEND CP TCPIP ...
The first approach when your network colleagues are cooperative, the
second for when you rely on your VM Systems Programmer being helpful.
Rob
Quick note for those of you who may have bookmarked items on the Sine
Nomine WWW site (such as SWAPGEN, etc). The WWW site has been revamped,
and your bookmarks probably don't work any longer. You may want to check
and update any references you have to our site.
We've already sent a list of
Hello,
We are planning to install Linux on Bare machine.
Should we opt for VM directly, instead?
With regards,
Maneesh
-Original Message-
From: Maneesh Menon
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation and administration
Hello,
I am
You have much more flexibility with VM. You can also run many Linux
instances under VM to accomplish varying tasks. There are lots of other
benefits as well, see: http://www.vm.ibm.com/linux/benefits.html
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 06:18, Maneesh Menon wrote:
Hello,
We are planning to install
One of our instances encountered several periods of slowness yesterday and
during my investigation one thing discovered that the one having the
problems wasn't using any of the swap assigned to it. Below is the output
of cat /proc/meminfo, first on the slow instance then on another instance
that
Ok... I have put the debian in vm rdr.
Ran rexx exec to copy to tape
Ipl from the mp2k3 the tape
I get a disabled wait 000a0
Any ideas..
Thanks for all your help..
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 8:49 PM
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Noll, Ralph wrote:
Ok... I have put the debian in vm rdr.
Ran rexx exec to copy to tape
Ipl from the mp2k3 the tape
I get a disabled wait 000a0
You are likely to need the tapemarks between the files... David gave the
command to do this with his REXX version
Thanks a bunch that worked..
Right until this message
Cramfs: wrong magic.what ever this means
And
Kernel panic vfs: unable to mount root fs on 01:00.???
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Vic Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:48 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Jul 27, 2004, at 6:18 AM, Maneesh Menon wrote:
Hello,
We are planning to install Linux on Bare machine.
Should we opt for VM directly, instead?
If you have the budget for it, absolutely. S/390 machine cycles are so
much more expensive than Intel cycles that the only way it makes
economic sense
On Jul 27, 2004, at 8:58 AM, Noll, Ralph wrote:
Thanks a bunch that worked..
Right until this message
Cramfs: wrong magic.what ever this means
And
Kernel panic vfs: unable to mount root fs on 01:00.???
It means you're getting closer. You loaded the kernel. One of the
first lines on
Do I still need the tape marks between the files...
I never done that before on the marist dist..
Thanks
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mp2003
On Jul 27, 2004, at
Hi Maneesh, please excuse my delay in answering but I didn't see your
message until now to my surprise.
The real advantage to install Linux under z/VM is this:
If you install Linux on a bare machine you need a correspondence:
1 Linux -- 1 bare machine
2 Linux -- 2 bare machines
On Jul 27, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Noll, Ralph wrote:
Do I still need the tape marks between the files...
I never done that before on the marist dist..
It probably won't hurt. Might help.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive
IF you plan to just play with it, putting it on an LPAR is fine. You'll
still get some idea of what you're dealing with. However, since you only
have a finite amount of lpars, doing this rapidly becomes a limiting factor
when you want to have many Linux guests.
If you already have VM at your
Hello,
Are there manuals available for installation on Bare Machines?
With regards,
Maneesh
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 7:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installation and
I have tried it many times still getting couldn't find valid ram disk
image starting at 0..
I guess try and download again???
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mp2003
On Jul
DEBIAN INITAG A1 F 1024 1284321 7/27/04
9:50:20
DEB EXEC A1 F 78 32 1 7/27/04
9:40:02
DEBIAN PARMFILE A1 F 1024 1 1 7/27/04
8:37:07
DEBIAN INIT2A1 F 1024 83 21
I'm investigating several reasons for sever slowdowns.
What other symptoms are you having? What is your paging
subsystem?
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:05:46 -0500
From: Marist EDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of our instances encountered several periods of slowness
yesterday and during my
On Tuesday, 07/27/2004 at 09:31 EST, James Melin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IF you plan to just play with it, putting it on an LPAR is fine. You'll
still get some idea of what you're dealing with. However, since you only
have a finite amount of lpars, doing this rapidly becomes a limiting
factor
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246264.html
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Maneesh Menon
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installation and administration
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 17:31, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Has anyone run this on SuSE 8? Does anyone know where I
can find it in .rpm
format?
We've been running it on our Intel systems for quite a while now, and
it's been completely stable (and very useful). With the addition of the
referential
META HTTP-EQUIV=refresh CONTENT=3; URL=the new one
Isn't automation wonderful? Someone tole me once that it was
what computers were designed
for.
...bouncy 70's music plays...
Gee, Mr Wizard, how DID you get that predictive model for every
possible transition combination without asking
I guess I will give up for now..
I'll just load suse...it works
I keep getting no valid ramdisk... I have ftp'ed many times and created
the tape
Many times.. Even different tapes... Same error..
Thanksforall your help
Ralph
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 11:56, David Boyes wrote:
(PPS -- For folks who don't recognize it, Ask Mr Wizard was a popular
science education TV show in the late 1970s and early 1908s.
Oh, Mr. Wizard goes back farther than that!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Wizard
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and
Watch Mr. Wizard with Don Herbert premiered on March 3, 1951 on the
Chicago affiliate of NBC. It was cancelled by NBC on September 5,1965. NBC
later revived the series for September 1971 through September 1972.
/Thomas Kern
/301-903-2211
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
Hi Maneesh,
If you can afford VM - get it! It will make your life a LOT easier, and
allow you to run multiple Linux instances in a single LPAR (or in basic mode
if the box is not LPAR'd) under VM. You'll also be able to better manage
those Linux guests with VM as a hypervisor.
Michael Coffin,
Which Linux for z/Series distribution are you planning on using? The short
answer is that all should have some amount of documentation available. :)
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6527
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Voice: (202)
I don't see any s390 rpm on that page. Tar files, yes and rpm's for other
platforms, but not a s390 .rpm - or am I missing something?
Maybe I'll have to go with that. I was hoping to find a .rpm to make life
simpler.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
Watch Mr. Wizard with Don Herbert premiered on March 3, 1951 on the
Chicago affiliate of NBC. It was cancelled by NBC on
September 5,1965. NBC
later revived the series for September 1971 through September 1972.
Yep. KQED (our local TV station at the time) ran it in reruns well into
the 1980s.
It is a tar.gz file, but it doesn't contain source. It contains the
binaries. Not an RPM, true, but something you could do some testing with,
perhaps.
If you want a source RPM from which you can build something that will most
likely run quite well on SLES8, take a look at this:
Thanks Mark.
I don't particularly want to be bleeding edge, but someone here says they
need some feature in it on their server.
Marcy Cortes
(415) 243-6343
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
Maybe they need the outrageously new and cutting edge ability to do a subselect or run
stored procedure ;)
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MySQL 4.0
Thanks Mark.
I don't
META HTTP-EQUIV=refresh CONTENT=3; URL=the new one
Isn't automation wonderful? Someone told me once that it was
what computers were designed for.
Well, Billy, it's like this: Sometimes you put a transition support
piece in place for a short period, but it's really more effective to ask
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 09:48, Noll, Ralph wrote:
I have tried it many times still getting couldn't find valid ram disk
image starting at 0..
I guess try and download again???
You might go look on the VM downloads site and grab MD5. It's a module
and a Rexx interface to it that does an MD5
Ralph,
This vaguely reminds me of a problem that I had with Debian(?) under
Hercules. As I recall, the problem was that I created my tape image
using the card images. This did not work! IIRC the tape
LRECL/BLOCKSIZE was 1024 and the card images were 80 bytes. So the last
944 bytes of every record
For anyone that is using Red Hat AS 3.0 for zSeries, can you provide
feedback (positive or negative) about your experience with the product?
Many thanks.
Eric Biggs
Sprint
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
I was very happy with the install and support form Redhat for a couple of
POC we did.
We are looking at convincing Sybase to put there database products on Linux
on zSeries and then we think things will really take off here.
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: Biggs, Eric J [ITS]
Biggs, Eric J [ITS] wrote:
For anyone that is using Red Hat AS 3.0 for zSeries, can you provide
feedback (positive or negative) about your experience with the product?
Light years better than RHAS2.1 (or whatever you want to call their
7.x product on z). Might be better than SLES8. We're getting
Shouldn't those DEBIAN files be RECFM F LRECL 80?
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6527
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224
Voice: (202) 927-4188 FAX: (202) 622-6726
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
When you get SLES9, I will be VERY interested in how you upgrade an
existing SLES8 system to SLES9. A migration experience story would be nice
to see.
Chris Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mm.comTo
For anyone that is using Red Hat AS 3.0 for zSeries, can you provide
feedback (positive or negative) about your experience with
the product?
It seems much better tested than the previous release, although support
still seems to be spotty (the quality of the support varies widely from
call to
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 14:42, Biggs, Eric J [ITS] wrote:
For anyone that is using Red Hat AS 3.0 for zSeries, can you provide
feedback (positive or negative) about your experience with the
product?
We installed RHEL 3.0 to test a claim* that WebSphere ran twice as fast
under that distro.
James Melin wrote:
When you get SLES9, I will be VERY interested in how you upgrade an
existing SLES8 system to SLES9. A migration experience story would be nice
to see.
We're an ISV... likely will be a new install rather than an
upgrade (sorry).
Dennis Wunder, Carlos Ordonez, and Michael MacIsaac have contributed a paper
on z/VM VSWITCH with failover. According to the abstract, An overview of
z/VM's virtual switch is described, then a secenario [sic], or HOWTO, is
presented in section 1.2, Setting up VSWITCH with failover on page 4.
No, because he wants to write them to a tape.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coffin
Michael C
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mp2003
Shouldn't those DEBIAN files be RECFM F LRECL 80?
Follow up with Barton, but I don't think your problems have anything to do
with your swap files. You have 750MB systems defined. Of that amount,
330MB, and 220MB are being used for cache, and 12MB and 117MB are being used
for buffers. So, for each of them, roughly 340MB is being used for one or
No I already looked at that...
Any other ideas
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mp2003
Ralph,
This vaguely reminds me of a problem that I had with Debian(?) under
Hercules. As I
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Post, Mark K wrote:
If you want files that are older than 5 days, and haven't been accessed
in that time, the -atime predicate does that.
Beware that some distro vendors and performance mavens are starting to
recommend that the noatime mount option be used to increase disk
48 matches
Mail list logo
