Please see the What's New page at:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml
for a change summary of the 2004-09-14 additions and changes to the
Linux for zSeries and S/390 developerWorks Web pages.
June 2003 stream:
- kernel 2.4.21: Kernel patch with
Hi all,
Anybody seen the following conditions :-
o VM linux guest hangs. No response to ssh or at 3270 console. Pings
from other servers (external and internal) ok though (?)
o VM CPU @ 100%.
o No VM paging.
o VM guys say linux is looping.
zSeries 800/SLES8 SP2
Would a linux guest memory issue
-Original Message-
From: Seader, Cameron
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 07:27
To: 'Troyski'
Subject: RE: Guest freeze
no, I had something happen to me some time ago and novell/suse checked with IBM and
they had no current solution for the problem, They stated that IBM was working on
Here is some more information about what we had discovered after talking with SuSE.
This problem was never resolved.
Just an update on the bug found yesterday. I just got off the phone talking with
Novell's SUSE support department and we were able to narrow down which package was
causeing the
Does anyone know a good way to archive catalina.out on a regular basis?
Any way to do it while Tomcat is up?
This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
information. If you are not the intended
Hello,
Has somebody already get success with VMRMSVM ?
I'm not able to obtain the performance goals I defined.
Is there another way to dynamically adjust CPU share and I.O ?
TIA for your responses.
Bests Regards,
Gerard MONTELEONE
Ingenieur Systeme Reseau
SI.TE.C Z.I du vazzio 20090
I can't answer the second part, but logrotate would probably be the
preferred method. Look at /etc/logrotate.conf.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith,
Ann (ISD, IT)
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ann (ISD, IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 03:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat catalina.out
Does anyone know a good way to archive catalina.out on a regular basis?
Any way to do it while Tomcat is up?
Check
I installed Slack390 10.0 a couple of weeks ago but was never able to establish a gdm
or xdm session. Mark Post gave me several suggestions which did get me past some
problems but I was still unable to get a gdm or xdm session. So this week I
downloaded and installed Slack390 9.1. I am able
All,
I tried to replicate Richard's problem by downloading XLitePro, but
couldn't. The version I was able to get, XLitePro 1.3, worked with
Slack/390 -current (10.0), which is why I recommended Richard try that.
Unfortunately, he had already overwritten his 10.0 install with 9.1, so we
don't
Do you know what specifically triggers the problem? I was just asked if we
could do samba.
Seader, Cameron
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.comTo
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a handful on Linux guests (20 or so) running in our z/VM 4.4
environment. Yesterday, for some strange reason, 4 of them started
having terrible response times. Here are some of the ping times. These
were issued from another guest.
BAD one:
PING pkdl0106.corp.sprint.com (10.185.26.16):
What does:
#CP Q SRM report?
How big are the Linux guests?
-Original Message-
We have a handful on Linux guests (20 or so) running in our z/VM 4.4
environment. Yesterday, for some strange reason, 4 of them started
having terrible response times. Here are some of the ping times. These
A new samba package is available for Slack/390 -current. These fix two
denial of service vulnerabilities reported by iDEFENSE. Slack/390 -current
has been patched to fix these issues. Sites running Samba 3.x should
upgrade to the new package. Versions of Samba before 3.0.x are
not affected by
This was forwarded to me by a co-worker. I'm wondering (assuming it all
works) what kind of applicability this might have for Linux on z/VM?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:44 AM
Subject: Stateless Linux project
An new approach for handling the
Has somebody already get success with VMRMSVM ?
Seems to work OK for me.
I'm not able to obtain the performance goals I defined.
Could you describe the goals you're trying to meet -- that'd help a lot
to help you get the right configuration.
We found out that with SLES8 2.4.21, you need to put 'primary_router' before the
portname in chandev.conf. Then reboot, since 'rcchandev reload' by itself doesn't
do it.
Ray Mrohs
Energy Information Administration
U.S. Department of Energy
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K
On Sep 14, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Biggs, Eric J [ITS] wrote:
We have a handful on Linux guests (20 or so) running in our z/VM 4.4
environment. Yesterday, for some strange reason, 4 of them started
having terrible response times. Here are some of the ping times.
These
were issued from another guest.
CP Q SRM
IABIAS : INTENSITY=90%; DURATION=2
LDUBUF : Q1=300% Q2=200% Q3=110%
STORBUF: Q1=150% Q2=125% Q3=100%
DSPBUF : Q1=32767 Q2=32767 Q3=32767
DISPATCHING MINOR TIMESLICE = 5 MS
MAXWSS : LIMIT=%
.. :
Also we do not see any one in the E-lists.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Biggs, Eric J [ITS]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP response time
CP Q
The procedure has the following statement:
[StatelessLinux]
name=Stateless Linux
baseurl=http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/stateless
Gripe:
Why does RedHat insist that we connect to their sites
to get updates (up2date) and do builds. I happen to
have a number of systems that do NOT connect to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/14/2004 12:47:57 PM
The guests are all about 256MB.
This is the classic nothing has changed story. None of us are
aware
of anything that has changed over the past few days. Previously, all
the guests ran like champs. We did go ahead and reboot one of the
troubled guests
Now that's pretty weird. Glad you got it fixed, though.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mrohs,
Ray
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Primary router question
We found out that with
SysVInit (which, if you didn't see the initial announcement, brings
better-than-System-V-init-processing to VM/ESA and z/VM) has now been
updated to version 0.3.
Significant changes: no more SYSVINIT NAMES or MAINLOOP EXEC files, so
configuration is somewhat simplified. SysVInit is now a lot
I found a saved copy of my 10.0 Slack390. Booted it up and tryed to establish a gdm
session using XLitePro 1.3 and the session failed. At least for me, it looks like 9.1
is the one to go with.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/14/04 12:39PM
All,
I tried to replicate Richard's problem by downloading
Isn't this usually indicative of the Linux guest being shoved way down
in VM's dispatching mechanism?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Derric Goodwin
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP response
On Maw, 2004-09-14 at 19:02, Jim Sibley wrote:
The procedure has the following statement:
[StatelessLinux]
name=Stateless Linux
baseurl=http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/stateless
I doubt dmalcolm reads this list so suggestions on statelsss Linux
improvements are best sent to him really. All
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Monteleone wrote:
Has somebody already get success with VMRMSVM ?
I'm not able to obtain the performance goals I defined.
Is there another way to dynamically adjust CPU share and I.O ?
You could use the VM Perfkit and define thresholds for specific
28 matches
Mail list logo
