Having done it under 5.1, can I then IPL a 32-bit OS in that new config
(namely, Linux for the s390, not s390x, arch?)
Yea, is expected to work fine with 31bit Linux kernel. All you need to
have is 2.6.6. or newer, otherwise
Linux will only detect the first chunk (check /proc/meminfo to see what i
On Nov 22, 2004, at 4:28 PM, Bruce Hayden wrote:
Ref: Your note of Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:45:30 -0600
You missed this note in the help:
CONFIGuration is not supported for the 32-bit image of CP or for V=R
and
V=F users.
Your 32 bit image can't use it, but the 64 bit 5.1.0 can.
Having done it under 5.
Ref: Your note of Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:45:30 -0600
You missed this note in the help:
CONFIGuration is not supported for the 32-bit image of CP or for V=R and
V=F users.
Your 32 bit image can't use it, but the 64 bit 5.1.0 can.
Bruce Hayden
IBM Global Services
Endicott, NY
-
When did this get added?
On our 4.4 system.
HELP CP DEF --> DEFINE STORAGE
*shows* the CONFIG option.
On a 5.1 system, the command works fine:
15:49:12 Q CPLEVEL
15:49:12 z/VM Version 5 Release 1.0, service level 0401 (64-bit)
15:49:12 Generated at 08/31/04 17:33:32 CST
15:49:12 IPL at 11/17/04 16:
I'm trying to figure out where I have memory pressue coming from in my
WebSphere environment.
I have a WebSphere footprint of 839 megs, real memory of 1.2 gigs, VDISK
of 120 meg and real swap of 830 megs (I know, a little short). The
WebSphere environment seems to be fine during the day, when I s
We got our SLES 8 system up and now want to add an additional 3390
volume just for a user directory. We haven't had any luck in finding
out how this can be accomplished. Any suggestions or pointers into
where to find the commands would be appreciated.
Thanks
Mike Wickman
===
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:46:56 -0500 Daniel Jarboe said:
>> I have a 64-bit SLES 9 test system that I've been playing with. I
>> recently applied some patches that Suse had recommended applying.
>> After I recycled the system, it will no longer talk to the guest lan.
>> It worked prior to the patche
> I have a 64-bit SLES 9 test system that I've been playing with. I
> recently applied some patches that Suse had recommended applying.
> After I recycled the system, it will no longer talk to the guest lan.
> It worked prior to the patches and no changes have been been made on
> the VM side.
It
Daniel: you can try checking your SRM values with QUERY SRM ALL. Check
STORBUF and LDUBUF.
IND Q EXP, IND PAGING, IND I/O may help, too. IND LOAD for paging rates
as well as
QUERY ALLOC PAGE. Are you using a real time performance monitor?
Most useful.
David Kreuter
Are there any VM commands we can
Did anyone else have trouble with the ISO images? Specifically, discs 1
and 2 from the S390 set. It took me two tries to get disc 1 and four
tries to get disk 2, before the MD5SUMs matched.
I could buy a random corruption, but the first 3 tries for disc 2 showed
the same (bad) checksum.
---
Carsten Otte wrote:
> Anyway, you can use the parameter (diag) in your parmfile/kernel
parameter
> list to choose diag for a specific device
> or range. Works like this:
> "dasd=1234,1235(diag,ro),1236-1240,1241-1250(diag)"
Yup, that worked.
Thanks to all who replied.
"Mike MacIsaac" <[EMAIL PR
A few weeks ago we had what over time grew into a big problem
dispatching guests. Guests would stop being dispatched sometimes for 10
minutes at a time, for no reason that we could identify. Usually
shutting some guests down would get everyone dispatching again, but it
was a mess. We applied som
>I would think that Adam's not dealing with SUSE, but Debian.
>
>Adam, are you using an initrd? I didn't think Debian, did, but I figured
I
>should ask to make sure.
Good point. Quite frankly, when using dasd as a module on the initrd, you
need to add (diag) as a module parameter
like this: modpr
>So, there's really no way to say, "load *this* device with *this*
>discipline" ?
>I ask because I'm trying to get swap in DIAG again, and because I have
>all three DASD disciplines in the kernel, it's getting detected as FBA.
>Well, that shouldn't be so bad, in that I should be able to
>echo 1
>> *** Reply to note of Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:38:43 -0500 (EST/CDT)
>> *** by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> And it works only on 31-bit systems.
>>
>Leland Lucius did a kernel patch which fixes this, as long as you have
>less than 2G of main storage.
It seems questionable to me that a patch that makes the
15 matches
Mail list logo