Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

If by PTFs, he means z/VM maintenance, there is almost always some things to look out for there. If he's reasonably current, things should work fine. If by PTFs he means Linux maintenance, that really isn't an issue, since you'll have separate guests. Adding SLES9 to the mix doesn't pose any more

Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

Patrick B. O'Brien wrote: >I'm sure this is good but my VM guy is worried. I've got 10 SLES 8 guests. I >want to load up SLES9. Any worries? TIA! Well, 10xSLES8 = SLES80, so you'll not quite be able to fit 9xSLES9 in the same machine. OK, seriously: as others have suggested, there's no specific w

Re: Where did cpint_load go? (in SLES9)

Thanks (Ronald and Mark) for the swift answer... Because I'm working off a modified initrd I guess I'll manually do all the sanity check and the /dev magic or actually implement most of the script to the file-system and do a simple insmod cpint in the end... regards- Lior. On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18

VLAN_PLUS_VID_NO_PAD Support on RHEL 3

Greetings all, Has anyone tweaked RHEL 3 to support "vconfig set_name_type vlan_plus_vid_no_pad" (like SLES 8) instead of the default "vconfig set_name_type dev_plus_vid_no_pad"? I'm at kernel 2.4.21-9.EL. /etc/init.d/network and /sbin/ifup issue the "vconfig set_name_type", but /sbin/ifup needs

Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:51:09PM -0800, Patrick B. O'Brien wrote: > I'm sure this is good but my VM guy is worried. I've got 10 SLES 8 >guests. I want to load up SLES9. Any worries? TIA! None. That's what virtual machines are all about. -- db ---

Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

He's worried about ptf's and compatibility, or if there is any way our Lpar could affect our ZO/S Lpar. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 i

Estaré de vacaciones hasta el 28 de Diciembre.

I will be out of the office starting December 20, 2004 and will not return until December 28, 2004. I will respond to your message when I return. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [

Re: Where did cpint_load go? (in SLES9)

The cpint_load command does several things: 1. Does an insmod on the cpint kernel module 2. Checks /proc/devices to see what major device number it got assigned by the kernel 3. Creates the corresponding entries for that in /dev 4. Sets up a couple of symbolic links in /dev 5. Sets some owner and g

Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:51:09 -0800, Patrick B. O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sure this is good but my VM guy is worried. I've got 10 SLES 8 guests. I > want to load up SLES9. Any worries? TIA! If you plan to add 10 guests with SLES9 you certainly want to do some tuning. We've found th

Re: SLES 8 and SLES 9 in one VM Lpar, is that okay?

There shouldn't be, but then you didn't say exactly what was concerning your VM guy. If there was something specific, we might have information that will defuse the concern. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick B. O'Brien Sent:

Where did cpint_load go? (in SLES9)

I have a set of scripts that I need to maintain that use cpint_load to load modules through a custom initrd. I'm porting these scripts to SLES9 and I suddently found out that cpint_load isn't distributed in the cpint package anymore? I'm not familiar with the design idea of why this was used in the

VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 5e:01

I am getting the exact same error after applying the latest SuSE updates that brought my kernel from 2.4.24.251 to 2.4.24.261. One of those updates was for reiser. My root file system is reiser. I went through this exercise twice and verified that there is noting wrong with my zipl.conf and that it