Who are you thinking of when you refer to the z/Linux base team? The
IBM developers? People in the field acting as system administrator? If
the latter, the job isn't very much different from an Intel Linux
sysadmin.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
On 3/15/06, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who are you thinking of when you refer to the z/Linux base team? The
IBM developers? People in the field acting as system administrator? If
the latter, the job isn't very much different from an Intel Linux
sysadmin.
Considering the IBM
Do any of you that are attempting Mono on z/Linux have a strong feeling
for whether I should use the 31- or 64-bit flavor?
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209
--
For LINUX-390
Go for 64-bit. That's where I'll be concetrating my development efforts.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim
Do any of you that are attempting Mono on z/Linux have a strong feeling
for whether I should use the 31- or 64-bit flavor?
Mainframe z/Linux specialist, last level support.
Best Regards,
Bruce Gui
IBM Global Resource Delivery China
pan-IOT Europe Integrated Delivery Center - Platform Support Mainframe
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
I don't believe that autoyast understands zfcp syntax today, only dasd.
Tony Kubinski wrote:
I'm experimenting with AutoYaST trying to build a guest which has a zFCP
SCSI disk as its boot volume. Ideally, I'd like to pass the WWPN and LUN
for the boot volume to the SLES installation system.
