Hi Chaps,
I need to use a 3590 on Redhat 4 under VM. I have found the OCO and
downloaded the RPM and installed it. Now what do I do ? I can't seem to find
any documentation as to what I do next so I can actually use the tape drive.
My experience is all Mainframe based and not Unix
Crispin Hugo
Sy
It's very slow, but I was able to get to it.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Gentry
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:22 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: url question
Is the following url still valid?
http://www.m
WAS is not supported yet, DB2 is.
Marian
--- James Melin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marcy!
>
> Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM
> announcement that WAS version 6 or higher supports
> SLES 10. We've been waiting for that particular
> information.
>
>
>
>
> Marcy C
The tzdata RPM is a noarch, so a version from any distro that's even
close should work. I had been asked to look into this, and I was
watching for the change to RHEL4, but there has never been any mention
in the changelog for the package.
So I did a quick search, and found out about using the zdu
Is the following url still valid?
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
I've been trying to connect to it for the past 15 minutes and don't even
get a page displayed
or any kind of error message.
Thanks,
Steve G.
--
For
James, all,
> Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement
> that WAS version 6 or higher supports SLES 10. We've
> been waiting for that particular information.
I forwarded this question to a Guy Who Knows and he sent me this:
WAS 6.0.2 supported SLES 10 as of October 13, 2006. Ple
One of the downsides of running an OS that's been out of support for 3
years. Since there's no executable code in the timezone RPMs, you could
just take one from RHEL, or Fedora.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stahr, Lea
Sent
> I'm just curius, what's the purpose of having 2 virtuell cpu's defined
> when
> only 1 physical is around.
Some algorithms operate better with 2 or more engines to schedule things
on. From the Linux perspective, having 2 virtual CPUs often causes the
application to schedule work differently than
The reason ,if I remember correctly is WAS runs better
or needed multiple cpus. Something to do with
swapping work. we don't have anything to monitor with
except for top and our load ,with few exceptions, is
very low. Granted we are a small shop running a
z/890 a04 model 110 ,but again it works w
Hi Marcy!
Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement that WAS version 6 or
higher supports SLES 10. We've been waiting for that particular
information.
Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
Not to be picky, but, I think it's picky, not pickey.
"picky." *Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)*. Random House, Inc. 09 Jan.
2007. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/picky>
MA
On 1/8/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pickey, pickey, pickeyone little character .
Thanks,
On 1/9/07, Ingo Adlung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be surprised if it would not "run", however, from a performance
pespective you would not want to overcommit the physically available CPUs
for a single guest. I would not recommend to configure guests with a larger
SMP than the underpinnng
12 matches
Mail list logo
