Here is the ifcfg-eth0:
BOOTPROTO=none
SUBCHANNELS=0.0.0c60,0.0.0c61,0.0.0c62
DEVICE=eth0
NETMASK=255.255.255.240
BROADCAST=xxx.xxx.64.63
IPADDR=xxx.xxx.64.58
NETWORK=xxx.xxx.64.48
NETTYPE=qeth
ONBOOT=yes
GATEWAY=xxx.xxx.64.49
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
PEERDNS=yes
And route -n
Kernel
Looking for some ideas.
Basically what I need to do is to send files, usually print files, from VSE
to other platforms.
We currently use FTP from VSE. But now we need to encrypt everything. I
would prefer not to do the encryption in VSE, just too expensive.
One thought I had was to PNET the files
Wow! Thanks for all the responses...for right now, since all we need is
the device type and model... it looks like David Boyes' suggestion is the
easiest to try first. Thanks again everyone for your help.
susan
David Boyes' response
You need the snmptools package in your distribution (may
This might be of interest to those on the list that run Tivoli Storage
Manager software
---
September 24, 2007 (Computerworld) -- IBM has issued a warning to
customers that security fixes should be installed for two
Hi All
I am having a similar time to Martha with:
/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /data1Ù fsck.ext3 -a /dev/dasdc1
fsck.ext3: No such device or address while trying to open /dev/dasdc1
Possibly non-existent or swap device?
fsck.ext3 /dev/dasdc1 failed (status 0x8). Run manually!
The systems is SUSE
try
http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/linux390/docu/l26cdd03.pdf
David
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Ceruti, Gerard G
Sent: Wed 9/26/2007 12:59 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Suse disk missing
Hi All
I am having a similar time to
We possibly had something similar. We had to update the HSA with a hard
activate.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: David Kreuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
I'm trying to do manual configuration.
The problem now seems to be related to System Map.
Using value provided by IBM site during the DEFSYS command ( DEFSYS
LXSHR 0-FF EW 100-2FF SR 300-4FF EW MINSIZE=64M seems are related to
2.4 kernel system map.
Anybody know the new value for 2.6 kernel?
If your target zLinux is on the same mainframe as your VSE, why not FTP
directly to the zLinux system? SIFT/UFT would be nice, especially if you
could have a SIFT client on the VSE system, but I don't remember seeing
any SIFT/UFT server for zLinux. The original VM implementation and the
current
If your target zLinux is on the same mainframe as your VSE, why not
FTP
directly to the zLinux system? SIFT/UFT would be nice, especially if
you
could have a SIFT client on the VSE system, but I don't remember
seeing
any SIFT/UFT server for zLinux.
There are full NJE implementations for
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:59 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com, Ceruti, Gerard G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I am having a similar time to Martha with:
/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /data1Ù fsck.ext3 -a /dev/dasdc1
fsck.ext3: No such device or address while trying to open
An NJE connection would be even better than FTPing to the zlinux system.
Do any of the TCPNJE implementations include traffic encryption?
David Boyes wrote:
There are full NJE implementations for Linux and other systems.
--
-Tom Duerbusch wrote: -
I've asked before but now I know more about what I'm talking about
(if you can believe that G).
We are at a conversion point. Our CICS print output was being coded
to a hardware box (IDATA box). And those are going away. The new
printers that are wanted, are IP
VSE supports SSL over TCPNJE.
Thomas Kern wrote:
An NJE connection would be even better than FTPing to the zlinux system.
Do any of the TCPNJE implementations include traffic encryption?
David Boyes wrote:
There are full NJE implementations for Linux and other systems.
Hi Robert, I got the same error message you did when I tried to view
the page using Firefox, and this wasn't the first time I've gotten this
message when trying to visit developerworks. However, the sun finally
dawned, and I tried the link with IE (not my favorite browser needless
to say),
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:33 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sue Sivets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Robert, I got the same error message you did when I tried to view
the page using Firefox, and this wasn't the first time I've gotten this
message when trying to visit developerworks.
There is a 'uftd' source at
http://pb.casita.net/pub/uft/uft-1.7.tar.gz
The UFTD server in that package is pretty rough but works.
It receives files into /var/spool/uft/$USER in a form that can be
easily crunched (received, peeked, or discarded) by shell scripts.
(There is one control
Hi Mark, Firefox says it's V 2.0.0.6, and it's notified me that there's
an update waiting to be applied.
Sue
Mark Post wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:33 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sue Sivets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Robert, I got the same error message you did when I tried to
18 matches
Mail list logo