OMEGAMON XE has a client for Linux which is included in
the OMEGAMON XE for z/VM and Linux product, or can be purchased
separately. It includes process level data.
The CPU Timer based accounting is an improvement regardless of
whether you use normalization or not. The old method not only
had the p
Thanks for all the assistance. Novell will be hearing from me shortly.
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 13:55, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 2:48 PM, in message
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > The filesystem resize
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 2:48 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> The filesystem resized was /opt/softwareag.
> Before the resize, I believe there was zero space left.
Darren,
Ok, then I'd say you're in reasonably good shape. The LV sh
Mark,
The filesystem resized was /opt/softwareag.
Before the resize, I believe there was zero space left.
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 13:29, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:28 PM, in message
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:28 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I have attached the files of interest.
Darren,
Oh, my $DIETY. Your consultant used 3 3390-3 DASD volumes, to set up 3
separate LVM Volume Groups (and even then didn't u
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:31 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Now did I run mkinitrd/zipl before or after the resize and extend? I will
> have to think about this. Would that make the difference?
It's not relevant, unless there was a reboot i
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:37 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Calvin
Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this is SLES10 there is no need to unmount the file system before
> resizing it. You had to do that with SLES9 and earlier. SLES10 and later
> you can usually resize the voulme wi
> Brilliant work one and all. Thanks to the efforts of both Novell and
> Sine Nomine Associates the Community benefits.
> It is great that a plan like this can come together and add to the
many
> contributions by these two wonderful organizations.
I will, however, point out that it is literally a
Since this is SLES10 there is no need to unmount the file system before
resizing it. You had to do that with SLES9 and earlier. SLES10 and later
you can usually resize the voulme without unmounting the filesystem
Calvin Fisher
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 09:49, Mark Pace wrote:
> Here are my not
Mark,
I have attached the files of interest.
Thanks,
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 11:16, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:52 AM, in message
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > What am I looking for with the lvm comm
Brilliant work one and all. Thanks to the efforts of both Novell and
Sine Nomine Associates the Community benefits.
It is great that a plan like this can come together and add to the many
contributions by these two wonderful organizations.
Mark Post wrote:
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN, IBMVM, and
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:52 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darren Zamrykut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> What am I looking for with the lvm commands? I executed them, but from what
> I
> see, everything checks out. The lvm in question is active with all the
> physical volum
Mark,
What am I looking for with the lvm commands? I executed them, but from what I
see, everything checks out. The lvm in question is active with all the
physical volumes attached.
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 10:43, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:17 AM, in message
Now did I run mkinitrd/zipl before or after the resize and extend? I will
have to think about this. Would that make the difference?
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 10:17, RPN01 wrote:
> After resizing and extending the filesystem, did you run mkinitrd && zipl?
> If not, the dasd volume woul
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:17 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After resizing and extending the filesystem, did you run mkinitrd && zipl?
> If not, the dasd volume would disappear at the next IPL, and you'd get...
> Pretty much what you're getting.
I woul
Looking back at root's history, I did mkinitrd/zipl after lvextend but before
resizing the lvm.
Darren
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 10:17, RPN01 wrote:
> After resizing and extending the filesystem, did you run mkinitrd && zipl?
> If not, the dasd volume would disappear at the next IPL, and you'd
In most cases, if you use yast2 and its panels, all this will be done for
you. You can just add a new disk, format it, add it to a VG, tell it the new
size of the filesystem, and it will take it all from there.
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OE-5-55
It will take a while to generate the md5 hash. It has to read and
process the entire ISO file before returning to you.
Fuzzy
On Oct 31, 2007 11:13 AM, Paul Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I run the md5sum command, it goes to the next line and seems to wait for
> input. It does not outpu
memory is mostly wrong - you need to know the impact on real resource, you
don't get that
from inside linux.
page faults? the ones that require swapping in? from vdisk, who cares -
unless the vdisk
takes a page fault. from real disk, what if it's slow, you need to know what
happened
outside
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:13 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The rpm --checksig command simply returned to the command prompt. That is,
> there was no output from the command, but there was no error, either.
Ok, that's not good. You should have g
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:16 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would he be wanting to check the -src for the signature, or the noarch one?
> If he's trying to install the product, he isn't likely going after the -src
> rpm at all.
>
> My thought would be
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN, IBMVM, and Linux-390
It's been what seems like forever coming, but Novell, David Boyes and I are
happy to announce the immediate availability of the SUSE Linux Enterprise
Server 10 SP1 Starter System for IBM System z. To provide an overview of what
the starter system
After resizing and extending the filesystem, did you run mkinitrd && zipl?
If not, the dasd volume would disappear at the next IPL, and you'd get...
Pretty much what you're getting.
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OE-5-55200 First Street SW
/(
Would he be wanting to check the -src for the signature, or the noarch one?
If he's trying to install the product, he isn't likely going after the -src
rpm at all.
My thought would be to
Rpm --checksig \
/sles10/sles10root/dvd1/suse/noarch/xalan-j2-2.6.0-21.2.noarch.rpm
And see what it says about
The rpm --checksig command simply returned to the command prompt. That is,
there was no output from the command, but there was no error, either.
When I run the md5sum command, it goes to the next line and seems to wait for
input. It does not output anything that looks even remotely like the chec
Thanks for the reply.
I did all the commands below with success.
But something came to mind that might be in relation to the problem, not sure.
This lvm was previously created with 2 volumes and then mounted. A
contractor then ftp'd files to a directory within the mounted lvm until it
was co
Anyone succeeded in using Windows System Services for UNIX NFS client
to mount a directory served by SLES9 NFS?
John Romanowski
z/VM - zLinux Support
NYS Office for Technology
(518)485-9555
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be co
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:49 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-snip-
> /sles10/sles10root/dvd1/suse/src/xalan-j2-2.6.0-21.2.src.rpm
> lxsrc:/sles10 #
>
> So, the rpm files for xalan DO appear to be there, but it seems that the
> install procedure on
I finally had a chance to try the find command that Mark Post suggested. Here
are the results. To refresh your memory, when I try to install tomcat5, I get
an error saying that it can't find xalan.
lxsrc:/sles10 # find /sles10/sles10root/dvd1 -type f -name "xalan*.rpm"
/sles10/sles10root/dvd1/su
Here are my notes when I want to increase my LVM space.
vgextend vg1 /dev/dasdx1
vgdisplay
Look for Total PE
lvextend –l total_PE /dev/vg1/lv1
umount your logical volume
e2fsck –f /dev/volume group/logical volume
resize2fs /dev/volume group/logical volume
remount your volume gro
It helps to license the product first; this isn't something that comes with
z/VM.
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OE-5-55200 First Street SW
/( )\ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905
^^-^^ -
"In theory, theory and pr
ESALPS is a product suite from Velocity Software. See
http://www.velocity-software.com.
Luis La Torre wrote:
I tried using esalps under 5.2 and vm says ..
ESALPS
Unknown CP/CMS command
Regards,
Luis F. La Torre
Database Administrator
BAX Global Inc.
440 Exchange, Irvine Ca 92602
Phone:
I tried using esalps under 5.2 and vm says ..
ESALPS
Unknown CP/CMS command
Regards,
Luis F. La Torre
Database Administrator
BAX Global Inc.
440 Exchange, Irvine Ca 92602
Phone: 714-442-7441
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich Smrcina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Swen Schillig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
add some statistics provided by the zFCP adapter to the sysfs
The new zFCP adapter statistics provide a variety of information
about the virtual adapter (subchannel). In order to collect this information
the zFCP driver is extended on one side to query the
On 10/31/07, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Linux reports 10% usage and a steal time of 90% then its short on
> CPU, if the sum of the usage and steal time is not close to 100% then
> there is spare cpu time that could be used by the Linux processes. This
> can be concluded ins
On 10/31/07, Morris, Kevin J. (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scenario:
> 1. LinuxA normally uses a steady ~30% cpu.
> 2. At 10:30am, it was noticed that LinuxA's cpu pegged 100% and memory
> consumption increased to the point of heavy swapping
> 3. At 11:10am, LinuxA's cpu went back to ~30
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 09:49 +0100, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> The other part is the virtualization effect, where the Linux kernel
> believes it uses 100% of the CPU, but because of shared resources on
> z/VM it only gets 10% (so all readings are order of magnitude off).
> The latest Linux kernels ha
On 10/31/07, Morris, Kevin J. (LNG-DAY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cannot afford to run something on Linux?
> - How does ESALPS gather the Linux process-level data outside of
> running an agent/application ON Linux?
The big difference is whether you use an active agent or active agent.
ESALPS
38 matches
Mail list logo
