On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Jim Elliott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As others have suggested, use something like Track, ESAMON,
Perfkit/RTM to find out what is causing the high CPU utilization.
And your focus would be the z/VM 3.1 guest first. The z/VM 5 system is
happy to give available
Ted Rodriguez-Bell wrote:
Has anyone done any testing to see what the right reserved block
percentage (-m to tune2fs or mke2fs) is? On the Berkeley Fast
Filesystem the right number was 10%; the ext2/ext3 default is 5% so I
assume that's pretty good for most Linux. But with so many layers
Mark posted a nice summary (pun intended). Just one clarification,
OMEAGMON XE did ship support to properly normalize the CPU values for
older releases of Linux. This shipped in September 2007 as VM64299 available
for both the z/VM 5.2 and 5.3 versions of Performance Toolkit.
PTF UM32169 for z/VM
Rob van der Heij writes:
When we saw the first new z/VM installations with Linux show up, I
proposed a new feature for the Linux disk driver that would allow
arbitrary tracks to be read and written (like the pipeline stages).
That way a Linux guest could be used to backup the VM packs along
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Malcolm Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote writetrack and readtrack kernel modules for Linux 5 years
ago which implement ioctls to do that along with simplistic userland
utilities and they worked OK for me to transfer various VM and z/OS
disks as images
I upgraded to SLES10-SP2 and all seems well. I then enter SPident because
I like seeing SP2 installed and I get the following:
CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date!
foundSLE-10-s390x-SP1 + online updates
expected SLE-10-s390x-SP2
e!
a SPident ?vvv indicates the following:
-
Rob van der Heij writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Malcolm Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote writetrack and readtrack kernel modules for Linux 5 years
ago which implement ioctls to do that along with simplistic userland
utilities and they worked OK for me to transfer various
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
I upgraded to SLES10-SP2 and all seems well. I then enter SPident because
I like seeing SP2 installed and I get the following:
CONCLUSION: System is NOT up-to-date!
foundSLE-10-s390x-SP1 + online updates
expected SLE-10-s390x-SP2
e!
a
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:14 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
I get a bit concerned when a group (Novell) should know better than to
require a cd-ripper on System z!
It's hardly required. I don't have it installed on any of my System z guests.
Agreed, this distribution is not the most optimized distribution (I do not
if any are) for big blue. I cannot find 562.7 anywhere either.
Peter
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
06/19/2008 01:16 PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
And what about USB support?
I haven't seen any USB ports on my 9672, and I don't think my (arriving soon)
z9 has any, either. Maybe on the HMC?
Dave
Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:14 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
-snip-
The copy of SP2 I just downloaded a day or two ago only has 562.4, not
562.7!
Oh, and be careful not to confuse cdparanoia and cdparanoia-32bit. They do
have different build numbers (.4 versus .7).
Mark Post
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:39 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
What is this? I tried to uninstall this but started to receive many
dependency chains. Did anyone else have this problem? Would it be easier
to install
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And what about USB support?
What about it? I've published (two now) scripts to generate AutoYaST
installation files that eliminate stuff like that. If you're not willing to
use those
I'm not familiar with SPident usage.
Under what conditions will it report SLES10 SP2 instead of System is
NOT up-to-date! ?
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or
otherwise legally protected. It is
I do not know about these scripts. Where can I get a copy or am I too
late? I would love to put my SLES on a diet. Things slip in because it is
a dependency of a dependency of a dependency of a dependency . . .
Peter
Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
We have installed SUSE 10 + SP2 succesfully and SPident shows on the
controller:
l
CONCLUSION: System is up-to-date!
foundSLE-10-s390x-SP2 + online updates
Then, we cloned a guest and SPident shows:
Summary (using 499 packages)
Product/ServicePack
possible? or no?
+--+
| Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services |
| IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |
| email [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| work (405)522-1306 cell (405)312-1527 |
No on z9 and previous. z10, I'm not sure.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Little, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
possible? or no?
+--+
| Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services |
| IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |
Currently, no.
Little, Chris wrote:
possible? or no?
+--+
| Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services |
| IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |
| email [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| work (405)522-1306 cell
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Little, Chris
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:17 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: mixing IFLs and GPs in an LPAR
possible? or no?
+--+
From the announcement information for the z10.
Increased flexibility with z/VM-mode partitions
System z10 EC provides for the definition of a z/VM-mode partition
(LPAR) containing a mix of
processor types including CPs and specialty processors IFLs, zIIPs,
zAAPs, and ICFs. With the
planned z/VM
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:29 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Feller,
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the announcement information for the z10.
Increased flexibility with z/VM-mode partitions
System z10 EC provides for the definition of a z/VM-mode partition
(LPAR) containing a mix
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not know about these scripts. Where can I get a copy or am I too
late? I would love to put my SLES on a diet. Things slip in because it is
a dependency of a
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:44 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Romanowski, John (OFT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not familiar with SPident usage.
Under what conditions will it report SLES10 SP2 instead of System is
NOT up-to-date! ?
If all the RPMs on your system are at the SP2 level
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Luis
La Torre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have installed SUSE 10 + SP2 succesfully and SPident shows on the
controller:
l
CONCLUSION: System is up-to-date!
foundSLE-10-s390x-SP2 + online updates
Currently no. But it is coming. Soon? You need a z10 and z/VM later than 5.4
(z/VM 6.0 maybe).
Little, Chris wrote:
possible? or no?
+--+
| Chris Little OKDHS Platform Services |
| IS Operating Systems Specialist IV |
|
Thank you all for your response.
It was decided to accelerate (like, right now) into production our current
testing/development of upgrade from z/VM3.1 to z/VM5.3 . It is a big
challenge to do it in such a short time.
Thanks again,
Ismael
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
On Thursday, 06/19/2008 at 03:42 EDT, Stephen Frazier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently no. But it is coming. Soon? You need a z10 and z/VM later than
5.4
(z/VM 6.0 maybe).
A z/VM LPAR is a Statement of Direction in the z10 announcement from
back in February. No dates were given and nothing
29 matches
Mail list logo
