2009-01-08 Linux on System z code drop to developerWorks

Please refer to: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html ... for the 2009-01-08 change summary: > snIPL V2.1.4 with bug fixes and enhancements * end of message Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Gerhard H

Re: Losing IP connection on Virtual switch durin SLES10 installation - Fixed

Thanks for all those who responded. I installed SLES10 SP2 and that fixed the problem. There must have been some incompatibitlities with z/VM 5.4 and SP1 base. Regards, Jihad K. Kawkabani IT Systems Engineer Consultant Voice: 440.395.0740 Network: 575.0740 Cell: 440.465.2969 Ron

SLES 8 run on zVM 5.3 z10

Is anyone running SLES 8 on zVM 5.3 on a z10? We are planning to upgrade to a z10 and I reviewed some of the archives but did not find anyone mentioning they run SLES 8 on a z10. We did find that SLES 8 is not certified by IBM for z10 but we would still like to know if anyone has run SLES 8. Al

Re: s390/hvc_console: z/VM IUCV hypervisor console support

Anything new in this area? TIA - Please consider the environment before printing this email and any attachments. This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain information which is pr

Re: s390/hvc_console: z/VM IUCV hypervisor console support

>>> On 1/8/2009 at 11:10 AM, Sterling James wrote: > Anything new in this area? > TIA Not that I have seen. Mark Post -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu wi

bash question.

Is there any better way, in a bash script, to pipe both stdout and stderr from an application other than using a subshell? So far the only way that I've thought of to do it is: (command parm1 ... 2>&1) | othercommand -- Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from? A: Ein Stein. Maranatha!

Re: bash question.

>>> On 1/8/2009 at 12:36 PM, John McKown wrote: > Is there any better way, in a bash script, to pipe both stdout and stderr > from an application other than using a subshell? So far the only way that > I've thought of to do it is: > > (command parm1 ... 2>&1) | othercommand Just: command parm1

Re: SLES 8 run on zVM 5.3 z10

Al, We have several SLES 8 instances running on z/VM 5.3 RSU 801 on a z/10. We did not encounter any problems after upgrading the processor or the z/VM operating system. Charles LeDuff Systems Programmer WPS Health Insurance Phone: (608) 223-5818 Email: charles.led...@wpsic.com "Alan Schil

Re: bash question.

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mark Post wrote: > >>> On 1/8/2009 at 12:36 PM, John McKown wrote: > > Is there any better way, in a bash script, to pipe both stdout and stderr > > from an application other than using a subshell? So far the only way that > > I've thought of to do it is: > > > > (command parm

Re: bash question.

On Thursday 08 January 2009 14:13, John McKown wrote: >Well, shoot. That never even occurred to me. What I thought that would do >was: > >Change stderr to go where stdout currently goes, then change stdout to go >into the pipe. I based this on the fact that if I do: > >command 2>&1 1>x.tmp > >Then

Re: bash question.

Thus, if you want the behaviour you described in the above command, you could do the following: command parms 2>&1 | cat >file.tmp which would put everything in the file file.tmp Erik Johnson On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote: > On Thursday 08 January 2009 14:13, John Mc

Re: bash shell question

Does this failure to behave as one might hope perhaps constitute a bug in a widely used admin utility? Erik Johnson On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Larry Ploetz wrote: > On 1/7/09 1:44 PM, John Summerfield wrote: >> >> I see no reason logrotate should not handle sparse files well when >> copying

Re: bash question.

On 1/8/09 9:36 AM, John McKown wrote: Is there any better way, in a bash script, to pipe both stdout and stderr from an application other than using a subshell? So far the only way that I've thought of to do it is: (command parm1 ... 2>&1) | othercommand Others have answered the question, but

Re: bash shell question

On 1/8/09 12:21 PM, Erik N Johnson wrote: Does this failure to behave as one might hope perhaps constitute a bug in a widely used admin utility? Hmmm...I think so, now that you mention it...at least, I know I'd prefer logrotate to keep sparse files sparse. - Larry --

Re: bash question.

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote: > On Thursday 08 January 2009 14:13, John McKown wrote: > >Well, shoot. That never even occurred to me. What I thought that would do > >was: > > > >Change stderr to go where stdout currently goes, then change stdout to go > >into the pipe. I based this

Sles 9 sp4 to sles10 sp2 upgrades

I've been trying out the sles 9 (sp4 here) upgrade to sles10 sp2 process. All goes well if using SSH. But, I'd really like to use VNC (much easier to navigate those yast package selection panels)... We've got a boat load of servers that need to be upgraded and I need lots of folks doing it :)