David Boyes wrote:
I'm more concerned about anti-trust. If the IBM/Sun merger is blocked on
anti-trust grounds, and Sun cannot locate another angel investor, my
Fujitsu? FJ uses a lot of sparc* stuff, does its own development, and is
in the same kind of business - supplying computers and
Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:44 AM, John Summerfield
deb...@herakles.homelinux.org wrote:
Okay, here is what I think.
Count the cost.
Do you get a full, working system? If not, there are extra costs for the
bits that are missing.
We're still trying to figure this out,
I consistently see this complaint, and it really rubs me wrong. Why
does everyone compare rpm to apt? Wouldn't rpm to deb be the correct
comparison, and then compare yum to apt?
Yes - rpm is a file format.
apt, yum, package-kit and various other tools then install rpm and or
dpkg files.
Hi Martin
This is how I have done all my installs, initial boot off the HMC CD, then
point to an NFS server ( SuSE PC) I have not been unable to get FTP work, but
NFS works great,
check the NFS exports are all defined correctly,
Have you checked /var/log/messages on the PC for any error
Please refer to:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html
to download the new Device Drivers, Features, and Commands as available
with SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 and related hints, which we
published 2009-03-24.
We have not announced this update earlier, because we
Well, you've given me a lot to think about. I guess what I'll probably wind
up doing is comparing hardware specs and maintenance prices between the
mainframe and a high end PC server that we could build or buy. For now,
though, I guess I'll have to wait for the specs.
Andrew
We are trying to allow users to change their mainframe password through
LDAP via ldappasswd command:
home/user1)#ldappasswd -A -S -H ldap://hostname:port# user1
Old password:
Re-enter old password:
New password:
Re-enter new password:
SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unless you've explicitly set up a SASL authentication method, you're
probably using simple authentication. Indicate this to linux via the
-x command line option to most ldap utils. Test it via ldapsearch, first.
E.g.:
ldapsearch -H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One more thing before I forget, if you have a
password sufficient pam_ldap.so ...
statement in the appropriate /etc/pam.d/... file, with the appropriate
defaults in /etc/ldap.conf, then users should be able to use the
standard unix 'passwd'
What you are looking for can be done. It will require a connector between
the LDAP server and Top Secret. I've set this up to run between
eDirectory and RACF using a DirXML RACF connector that we bought from
Novell. You would need to find a similar tool that would run between your
LDAP server
I like you're thinking and tested your idea however got a different
error:
ldappasswd -A -S -x -H ldap://hostname:port# user1
Old password:
Re-enter old password:
New password:
Re-enter new password:
Result: Protocol error (2)
Additional info: No backend for OID=1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.11.1
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CHAPLIN, JAMES (CTR) wrote:
I like you're thinking and tested your idea however got a different
error:
ldappasswd -A -S -x -H ldap://hostname:port# user1
Old password:
Re-enter old password:
New password:
Re-enter new password:
Result:
On 3/25/09 11:27 PM, Patrick Spinler spinler.patr...@mayo.edu wrote:
I consistently see this complaint, and it really rubs me wrong. Why
does everyone compare rpm to apt? Wouldn't rpm to deb be the correct
comparison, and then compare yum to apt?
Because the distribution vendors continue to
On 3/26/09 2:00 AM, John Summerfield deb...@herakles.homelinux.org
wrote:
David Boyes wrote:
I'm more concerned about anti-trust. If the IBM/Sun merger is blocked on
anti-trust grounds, and Sun cannot locate another angel investor, my
Fujitsu? FJ uses a lot of sparc* stuff, does its own
I'm going to avoid partisan issues, or at least attempt to do so :-) but
some corrections on Sun-specific stuff:
On 3/25/09 2:07 PM, David Boyes wrote:
In their defense, much of this is not technical in origin, but in licensing
agreements. The reason there is no OpenSolaris for SPARC is that
On 3/26/09 2:13 PM, Jeff Savit jeff.sa...@sun.com wrote:
I'm going to avoid partisan issues, or at least attempt to do so :-) but
some corrections on Sun-specific stuff:
The first part of that is correct, but not some of the other parts,
including the bit about OpenSolaris on SPARC.
The
Guys
Interesting stuff - kinfd of like watching an arm wrestling match. Take it
offline and let us know when y'all come to agreement. Thx
'Where ever you go - There you are!! '
Richard (Gaz) Gasiorowski
System z - Linux Product Manager
Portfolio Platform Services
CSC
3170 Fairview Park Dr.,
David Boyes wrote:
On 3/25/09 11:27 PM, Patrick Spinler spinler.patr...@mayo.edu wrote:
I consistently see this complaint, and it really rubs me wrong. Why
does everyone compare rpm to apt? Wouldn't rpm to deb be the correct
comparison, and then compare yum to apt?
Because the distribution
David Boyes wrote:
On 3/26/09 2:00 AM, John Summerfield deb...@herakles.homelinux.org
wrote:
David Boyes wrote:
I'm more concerned about anti-trust. If the IBM/Sun merger is blocked on
anti-trust grounds, and Sun cannot locate another angel investor, my
Fujitsu? FJ uses a lot of sparc*
My 2 cents:
I am not an expert.
I easily found a way to find a way to get a list of all processes in the
parent tree of my existing task in Solaris, but even asking for help on
the local Linux user group, could not find a way in Linux, short of
writing a program with a loop containing tests..
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, John Summerfield wrote:
I haven't yet figured out what's wrong with up2date.
Except of course that the server side source code has never
been released, and ran against an Oracle backend using stored
procedures for dep solving (so I am told) ...
What's not to love,
David Boyes wrote:
On 3/26/09 2:13 PM, Jeff Savit jeff.sa...@sun.com wrote:
I'm going to avoid partisan issues, or at least attempt to do so :-) but
some corrections on Sun-specific stuff:
The first part of that is correct, but not some of the other parts,
including the bit about
On 3/26/09 5:47 PM, Carey Tyler Schug wrote:
My 2 cents:
I am not an expert.
I easily found a way to find a way to get a list of all processes in the
parent tree of my existing task in Solaris, but even asking for help on
the local Linux user group, could not find a way in Linux, short of
On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Jeff Savit wrote:
We deliberately don't break compatibility in the
long-term-support version of the OS, as that would be a Bad Thing for
our customers who count on tools to work the way they did even if a
newer and even better (but not strictly compatible)
Would somebody please clarify - is LVM striping still of benefit to
performance if your disk is RAID?
If so, why?
Regards,
Fred Schmidt
NT Government, Australia
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
Is there another place where the virtues of non-Linux OS's can be debated?
I'm starting to get annoyed at the irrelevant (to me anyway) tennis match..
it's drifted on some wayward current to... ?
Scott
--
For LINUX-390
On 3/27/2009 at 1:17 AM, Fred Schmidt fred.schm...@nt.gov.au wrote:
Would somebody please clarify - is LVM striping still of benefit to
performance if your disk is RAID?
If so, why?
If you mean the disks in the storage array itself, then yes, because z/VM and
Linux can only start one
27 matches
Mail list logo
