Hello Kevin,
I recommend that you stop using EVMS and start using LVM2. The direction with
SLE11 and going forward is to use LVM2 as the logical volume manager and cLVM2
as the clustered filesystem aware volume manager. You will not need to
reinstall SLES10, LVM will be able to see the LVM LV
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 4:15 PM, "George, Kevin A"
wrote:
> I am having a problem with SLES 10 where it will not always boot
> because it is unable to find any of the file systems that are using
> EVMS. I am running under z/VM 5.3 and using mini disks. All are using
> ext3 as the file syste
Different article says that use of yum repositories with rug and zypper is also
unsupported.
I really don't much care, but others might.
On 3/27/09 2:12 PM, "Mark Post" wrote:
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 1:46 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> Um, not according to your www site. "Yum is officially unsupporte
I am having a problem with SLES 10 where it will not always boot
because it is unable to find any of the file systems that are using
EVMS. I am running under z/VM 5.3 and using mini disks. All are using
ext3 as the file system. When I have this problem I can usually reboot
and it will start
One other thing...
I said you can't exert any control over the network using this
technique. In so much as there are files in /proc that can be written
to (to change certain kernel parameters) you will be able to write to
them just as easily over the network (unless you mount read-only or
change
In this case NOC stands for Network Operations Center, and calling it
that might be a BIT misleading, because you don't have a tremendous
amount of control you could exert over the network from this single
node. This mechanism also doesn't allow for monitoring switches
(although there is no reason
>>> On 3/25/2009 at 2:53 PM, "Martin, Larry D" wrote:
> I am very new to Linux and am trying to install Linux on an LAPR on a
> z9BC.
Hi, Larry,
If you're still having problems with this, please contact me off-list. I'll
see what I can do to help you get up and running.
Mark Post
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 1:46 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> Um, not according to your www site. "Yum is officially unsupported, but
> here's how to set up a repository"
YUM itself is unsupported. You can use YUM repositories via rug and zypper
just fine.
Mark Post
--
Has anyone looked at a comparison of :
LVM striping vs SW RAID0 vs dm-multipath and PAV
I would suspect that LVM Striping and SW RAID0 will have similar
performance characteristics since they are mostly using device mapper
under the covers nowadays. LVM is more flexible, but is the code pat
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 1:34 PM, Richard Gasiorowski wrote:
> I went out to sorgeforge to find out more about this and my first concern
> that the last update for v9fs was 1/2006. It does state that The v9fs
> kernel code was merged into Linux's 2.6.14 development tree marking a
> fairly major tra
Um, not according to your www site. "Yum is officially unsupported, but here's
how to set up a repository"
If that's outdated, it should be removed.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send em
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 10:45 AM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what the latest level of freetype2 for SLES10 is? I think
> the original that came with SLES10 is 2.1 but have there been updates for
> subsequent Service Packs?
freetype2-2.1.10-18.17
Mark Post
-
I went out to sorgeforge to find out more about this and my first concern
that the last update for v9fs was 1/2006. It does state that The v9fs
kernel code was merged into Linux's 2.6.14 development tree marking a
fairly major transition for the v9fs project .
'Where ever you go - There you are
>>> On 3/27/2009 at 10:38 AM, David Boyes wrote:
-snip-
> It'd be nice if Novell "officially" supported one of them -- yum would be my
> vote. Packaging stuff for YaST is a PITA.
Support of YUM repositories has been in place for quite some time.
Mark Post
-
I see that you've gotten some excellent replies already.
In our shop, we originally avoided striping on the Linux side (that
is, within LVM) because we wanted to avoid a plaid or cross-hatch when
the data hit the physical media. Some of us now believe that #1
that's not really a problem and #2 w
Hi Daniel,
I didn't use the actual version of QEMU but 0.9.1 under Debian 4.0r3. The
gcc version is 3.4.6.
I have checked again the ./config:
./configure --disable-kqemu --enable-linux-user
--target-list=i386-linux-user x86_64-linux-user i386-softmmu x86_64-softmmu
Not all targets are building
On Mar 27, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Erik N Johnson wrote:
What's really great about this is that for a z/Linux
farm you can easily use 9p to create a single virtual host whch has a
/mnt all full of:
/mnt
/host1/proc
/host2/proc
...
/hostN/proc
then a perl (or shell or python) script ( or A
If you really want performance, the LVM should be stripped across RAID Arrays.
And make sure you use multiple controllers.
(i.e. in the DS6800 there are two controllers, each has half the cache. If you
do LVM across both controllers, you have the potential of using all the cache,
not just hal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is a really insanely cool idea, and one I've never considered.
Also network and union mounting /sys may be worthwhile ...
Thanks Erik. I'm definitely going to look into this more closely.
- -- Pat
Erik N Johnson wrote:
> In an attempt to brin
Neale Ferguson wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the latest level of freetype2 for SLES10 is? I think
the original that came with SLES10 is 2.1 but have there been updates for
subsequent Service Packs?
Neale
--
For LINUX-390 subsc
Eric, could you expand on your idea here a bit more? What's a Linux NOC?
Thanks.
Erik N Johnson wrote:
In an attempt to bring things back on topic for Scott, and everybody
else who is supposed to keep e-mail work related (sorry guys!) I would
like to point out a major feature of Linux that peop
Can anyone tell me what the latest level of freetype2 for SLES10 is? I think
the original that came with SLES10 is 2.1 but have there been updates for
subsequent Service Packs?
Neale
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive
On 3/26/09 6:57 PM, "John Summerfield"
wrote:
> So has Red Hat, though it took some time. SUSE too has solutions
> equivalent to apt - several of them.
It'd be nice if Novell "officially" supported one of them -- yum would be my
vote. Packaging stuff for YaST is a PITA.
Hi Florian, I was trying to follow your steps , downloading and
configuring the QEMU package but I have a lot of errors after /configure
script
could you help me giving any clue about how to fix the problems ? I
appreciate your help ..tks in advance Dany
Here its the configure script informatio
In an attempt to bring things back on topic for Scott, and everybody
else who is supposed to keep e-mail work related (sorry guys!) I would
like to point out a major feature of Linux that people seem to remain
unaware of. In Linux you can get virtually any piece of kernel
information from the vfs
Hi Fred,
Check out these documents from IBM and SHARE. It's good stuff and the
author
Martin K. will answer emails. He has been a good resource on this subject
for me.
David K.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/perf/tuning_presentations.html
http://download.boulder.ibm.com/i
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Mark Post wrote:
> If you mean the disks in the storage array itself, then yes, because z/VM and
> Linux can only start one I/O to a single device address at a time. (Unless
> you're using PAV.) If your LVs are striped across multiple devices, then you
> have
I will be out of the office starting 27-03-2009 and will not return until
28-03-2009.
Niet op kantoor - voor urgente zaken spreek aub boodschap in of sms!
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
28 matches
Mail list logo