Re: Low address protection

2010-03-12 Thread Neale Ferguson
Blush, fancy not looking at the length register! I should turn in my Local 76 Assembler Programmers union card. On 3/12/10 4:42 AM, "Martin Schwidefsky" wrote: MVCLE with a zero source length is a memset. The instruction only accesses the target address, the source address is of no concern. -

Re: Low address protection

2010-03-12 Thread Marcy Cortes
Yes, on a z10. Marcy "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received

Re: FCP Direct connect vs. SAN fabric...

2010-03-12 Thread Lee Stewart
Thanks to all... You're all right - who would want to? But I do see it's now supported... Miss one update and. Lee On 3/11/2010 10:49 AM, Mark Post wrote: On 3/11/2010 at 12:13 PM, Lee Stewart wrote: Isn't there (wasn't there?) a statement from IBM saying that direct connect of F

Re: Low address protection

2010-03-12 Thread Shane G
How disappointing ... :0) I was another thinking it was just Java being Java. Shane ... On Fri, Mar 12th, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > MVCLE with a zero source length is a memset. The instruction only > accesses the target address, the source address is of no concern. > > A lo

Re: Low address protection

2010-03-12 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:04:04 -0600 Neale Ferguson wrote: > It was doing a MVCLE 4,2 (a842) > > R2 - 0 so it was trying to reference page 0. > > > On 3/11/10 5:59 PM, "Marcy Cortes" wrote: > > Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: Low-address protection: 0004 [#1] > Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 ke