>>> On 9/9/2010 at 03:11 PM, John Dome wrote:
> Yes, Layer2. Yes, I noticed both stanza and tried consolidating those
> along with
> several other changes all fail with the same result.
>
> Are you suggesting that it won't work, or should I open an issue with
> support?
You should be able to d
Yes, Layer2. Yes, I noticed both stanza and tried consolidating those
along with
several other changes all fail with the same result.
Are you suggesting that it won't work, or should I open an issue with
support?
--
G. John Dome
Lead Systems Engineer
Progressive Casualty & Insurance
>>> On 9/9/2010 at 02:53 PM, John Dome wrote:
> Having difficulty using the autoyast installation method for SLES11 SP1,
> after the
> initial install when rebooting eth0 fails with this message:
-snip-
>
>
> static
> 10.101.240.255
> eth0
> 10.101.240.
The fourth quarter meeting of the Chicago Area VM (and Linux)
Enthusiasts will be held on Thursday, October 28, 2010.
We are scheduled to meet in room M2 off the cafeteria, it is right
next to room M3 where we frequently meet.
NOTE: We have a very full agenda for this meeting, and we will be
st
> > Now it starts to look interesting :)
> > Where is source of that example program ?
> Re: AF_IUCV. Yes, it would also work, but the programming is more
> complex. There's something to the ability to just use plain old 'cat'
> or any language that understands file I/O to deal with IUCV that I lik
> Now it starts to look interesting :)
> Where is source of that example program ?
http://download.sinenomine.net/fsiucv/
Re: AF_IUCV. Yes, it would also work, but the programming is more complex.
There's something to the ability to just use plain old 'cat' or any language
that understands file
Uhoh, he's now revealing a hidden third personality (Jack Benny)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Alan
Altmark
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:50 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: vmur usage ?
On Thursday, 09
Ok, yes I see.
The problem I wanted solve was that I need to know a zLinux server should
umount and detatch a shared disk.
We have the two z/VM systems connected and it allows only one to LINK to the
disk at a time.
But I cannot LINK if the disk isn't released, so the server having it mounted
n
On Thursday, 09/09/2010 at 03:55 EDT, Agblad Tore
wrote:
> Hi all.
> Is there anybody using vmur for communication, implemented
> by any scripts or similiar ?
>
> We would like to use disks owned by a non-booting z/VM userid
> that one out of two zLinux machines can LINK to in write mode.
> It's u
Now it starts to look interesting :)
Where is source of that example program ?
Cordialement / Vriendelijke Groeten / Best Regards / Med Vänliga Hälsningar
Tore Agblad
Volvo Information Technology
Infrastructure Mainframe Design & Development
SE-405 08, Gothenburg Sweden
E-mail: tor
We have :)
Cordialement / Vriendelijke Groeten / Best Regards / Med Vänliga Hälsningar
Tore Agblad
Volvo Information Technology
Infrastructure Mainframe Design & Development
SE-405 08, Gothenburg Sweden
E-mail: tore.agb...@volvo.com
http://www.volvo.com/volvoit/global/en-gb/
__
On Thursday, 09/09/2010 at 08:33 EDT, Shane G wrote:
> Who is this Altmark fella anyway ?.
Now cut that out! :-) I *said* I would still be hanging out here and in
IBMVM (and in IBMTCP-L and IBM-MAIN)!
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development (9..8..7..tick tock)
IBM Endicott
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Agblad Tore wrote:
> Does it really need to be in same z/VM system ?
> When my idea falls like a stone.
Yes, unless you have RSCS or SMTP to transfer spool files (which needs
network to) or CSE with shared spool (under some restrictions).
| Rob
-
Who is this Altmark fella anyway ?.
Shane
On Thu, Sep 9th, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
...
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the mess
Does it really need to be in same z/VM system ?
When my idea falls like a stone.
___
Tore Agblad
Volvo Information Technology
Infrastructure Mainframe Design & Development, Linux servers
Dept 4352 DA1S
SE-405 08, Gothenburg Sweden
Telephone: +46-31-323
Thank's for your input, my first option was to have a process
doing wait and checks, but I would be glad if I can avoid it,
just as you say.
These advices (or hint/tips) is for the moment above my knowledge.
Have to read some manuals here.
The use of vmur was to be able to communicate even when ne
On Thursday, 09/09/2010 at 07:03 EDT, David Boyes
wrote:
> > Unless I've missed some recent enhancements, I don't think we have a
> > way to trigger a user process on IMSG. So the receiver ends up polling
> > for input, which is not elegant.
>
> One way to do that would be to use the IUCV driver t
An AF_IUCV listener is almost identical to an AF_INET listener. (One
could theoretically modify 'inetd' or 'netcat' to accommodate IUCV
that way.)
But actually, *MSG is the server in this relationship, so we're
talking about a client. He connects and sits there waiting for
traffic; no polling. Swe
> Unless I've missed some recent enhancements, I don't think we have a
> way to trigger a user process on IMSG. So the receiver ends up polling
> for input, which is not elegant.
One way to do that would be to use the IUCV driver that Neale wrote and connect
to *MSG, then just use CP MSG to send
Martin, after offering a gem, exits with ...
> "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Been there.
Shane ...
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with t
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:29:59 +0200
Rob van der Heij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Agblad Tore wrote:
>
> > works nice, but we also need some automatic switching, and using vmur will
> > get it working despite any network failure.
>
> What does "vmur" add to your solution? You mean to
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Agblad Tore wrote:
> works nice, but we also need some automatic switching, and using vmur will
> get it working despite any network failure.
What does "vmur" add to your solution? You mean to signal a process
in another Linux guest (on the same z/VM) ?
Unless I'
Hi all.
Is there anybody using vmur for communication, implemented
by any scripts or similiar ?
We would like to use disks owned by a non-booting z/VM userid
that one out of two zLinux machines can LINK to in write mode.
It's used to get one filesystem accessible from any of two servers
to get re
