Dear Marc,
Yes, I do. But maybe it is something with the Browser (Firefox). I find
that also strange that's why I asked.
Kind regards,
Florian
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 6/27/2012 at 02:03 PM, Florian Bilek
> wrote:
>
> > The first option on the left side is se
>>> On 6/27/2012 at 02:03 PM, Florian Bilek wrote:
> The first option on the left side is selected, both selections on the right
> (by-path and by-id) are grayed out. After the installation the zipl.conf
> and fstab state /dev/dasda1.
I just re-tried it on my test guest, and it looks fine to me
Dear Mark,
The first option on the left side is selected, both selections on the right
(by-path and by-id) are grayed out. After the installation the zipl.conf
and fstab state /dev/dasda1.
Florian
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 6/27/2012 at 01:16 PM, Florian Bilek
>>> On 6/27/2012 at 01:16 PM, Florian Bilek wrote:
> For z/VM I used to specify in the fs-option of a partition the option
> "by-path" in order to ensure that the system uses always the form
> /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.0xxx-part1 as root and not /dev/dasd1 to identify
> the disk.
>
> In previous
Dear all,
I have a question regarding the SLES 11 SP2 partitioner,more specific, the
version that is used during the installation over VNC.
For z/VM I used to specify in the fs-option of a partition the option
"by-path" in order to ensure that the system uses always the form
/dev/disk/by-path/ccw
Mark,
We have an SR open with Novell, and a SAP OSS message open.
The Novell SR number is SR#10772685131.
(And may I say that Paul Evans, the Novell person handling this, has done an
excellent job in working with developers to identify the kernel level (sles10
sp4 .91) that this problem behavi
>>> On 6/14/2012 at 10:25 AM, Ron Foster wrote:
> So anyone running SAP on linux for zSeries care to share how their
> /usr/sap/trans is set up. Any special NFS mount options, etc.
Ron, do you have a service request opened on this problem? If so, with whom?
Mark Post
--
I think I found the problem. The z/os systems are defined in LCSS 0 and the
zlinux is in LCSS 2. The channels are defined as shared they should be spanned.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of McKown,
John
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Another silly question from me. Is the z/Linux system using iptables to do
firewalling? I don't know what z/Linux installs as a default.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phon
Correct the address of z/os is 192.168.1.11
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:13 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets
>>> On 6/26/2012 at 02:29 PM, Marcy Cortes
>>> wrote:
The ping times out from both the z/os and zlinux. We have multiple z/os systems
and they can ping each other, but the zlinux.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of McKown,
John
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 4:36 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIS
Tim,
thanks for the information. Without state change, I have to spend a
deeper look and try to recreate the problem here. This could take some
time since our servers all support the "READ SUBSYSTEM DATA" and I have
to workaround.
Stefan
Am 26.06.2012 16:56, schrieb Tim Full:
Thanks for the fe
12 matches
Mail list logo
