Re: Mz 2.14

2013-04-04 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:59:04 -0400 Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote: Mz was updated to version 2.14 today. Here are the changes: nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source rpm or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git repository? With

Re: Mz 2.14

2013-04-04 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Dan, nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source rpm or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git repository? It's about 99% in bash (with a small amount of JavaScript), so all the code is in the RPM. The one exception may be the mz.spec file is not in the

Re: Mz 2.14

2013-04-04 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 07:15:21 -0400 Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote: Dan, nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source rpm or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git repository? It's about 99% in bash (with a small amount of JavaScript), so

Re: Mz 2.14

2013-04-04 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Dan, what architecture is required for the server rpm, is it s390x only Yes, s390x only. A colleague for whom I have a lot of respect said words to the effect of: In systems management, the temptation is to abstract as much as possible across platform; systems management tools should drill

Re: Mz 2.14

2013-04-04 Thread David Boyes
Maybe a blade center could be considered an IA-CEC (Intel Architecture) and could be located under systems/. But then do they have LPARs, hipervisors (certainly not z/VM) and virtual machines? I think two, but not three. But then, I've done very little with virtualization on IA. Modern