On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:59:04 -0400
Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Mz was updated to version 2.14 today. Here are the changes:
nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source rpm
or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git repository?
With
Dan,
nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source rpm
or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git repository?
It's about 99% in bash (with a small amount of JavaScript), so all the
code is in the RPM. The one exception may be the mz.spec file is not in
the
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 07:15:21 -0400
Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dan,
nice to see it's an alive project, but can we get also the source
rpm or the mz.tgz archive? Or also the sources moved to a git
repository?
It's about 99% in bash (with a small amount of JavaScript), so
Dan,
what architecture is required for the
server rpm, is it s390x only
Yes, s390x only. A colleague for whom I have a lot of respect said words
to the effect of: In systems management, the temptation is to abstract as
much as possible across platform; systems management tools should drill
Maybe a blade center could be considered an IA-CEC (Intel Architecture) and
could be located under systems/. But then do they have LPARs, hipervisors
(certainly not z/VM) and virtual machines? I think two, but not three. But
then, I've done very little with virtualization on IA.
Modern