No worries Cam. What does #CP Q 203E report?
Original message
From: Cameron Seay
Date: 2015/08/14 23:38 (GMT-05:00)
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] detaching dasd attached to a guest
Help me out here, Neale.. I'm not clear about what I am trying to find
out
Help me out here, Neale.. I'm not clear about what I am trying to find
out. The sequence I followed was: attach 203E, 203F, 2107 *; cpfmtxa
203E, 203F, 2107; format 000 end; detach all the disks; edited the extent
control file; rlde extent control; edit the direct enttry for the guest
attaching t
Phew! So there were no messages from the attach operation?if MAINT's console
was spooled you should have a record. In fact the system operator's log should
have captured the attach operations (if successful).
Original message
From: Cameron Seay
Date: 2015/08/14 23:18 (GMT-05:0
It appears 122, 123, and 151 are full pack devices. Are any of these the ones?
All the other devices are definitely minidisks.
I am logged in to MAINT when I run it...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Neale Ferguson
wrote:
> What does #CP Q V DA report?
>
> The attach command is a class B command, did you really want to give your
> guest that level of privilege?
>
--
Cameron Seay, Ph.D.
Department of Computer Syste
Q V DA
DASD 0122 3390 A54SPL R/W 10017 CYL ON DASD 2100 SUBCHANNEL = 0004
DASD 0123 3390 540RES R/O 10017 CYL ON DASD 2000 SUBCHANNEL = 0005
DASD 0151 3390 DBN002 R/W 10016 CYL ON DASD 1212 SUBCHANNEL = 0006
DASD 0190 3390 540RES R/W107 CYL ON DASD 2000 SUBCHANNEL = 0007
What does #CP Q V DA report?
The attach command is a class B command, did you really want to give your guest
that level of privilege?
attach [disk id] * was what I used after it was formatted...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Neale Ferguson
wrote:
> What command did you use to attach / detach and was it on the user which
> had the devices attached to it?
>
> Original message
> From: Cameron Seay
> Date: 2
What command did you use to attach / detach and was it on the user which had
the devices attached to it?
Original message
From: Cameron Seay
Date: 2015/08/14 22:05 (GMT-05:00)
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] detaching dasd attached to a guest
I have several da
I have several dasd volumes attached to the wrong guest. When I try to
detach them I get "Device does not exist" message. I just want to assign
them to another guest.
Thanks in advance.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / ar
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:57:56 +
"Will, Chris" wrote:
> I just recently created a two member SSI using the previous 6.3
> cookbook. Is there any way to retrofit the sfs changes described in
> the new cookbook? I previously set the default sfs pool name to
> "POOL1".
The POOL1 relates to MINI
Agblad Tore wrote on 14.08.2015 15:14:49:
> Anyone knows if this is possible yet ?
>
> As I understand it's advertised to be available, but when ?
SLES12 has got the kernel support already, as will an upcoming RHEL 7
release.
Java can make use of this (some restrictions apply -- only useful for
la
Hej Frank,
I am also relatively new to z Systems, so I may not know everything, sry
for that :)
On 11:10 Fri 14 Aug , Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
> Well, I'm not married to this (fresh) install, but I do want to be able to
> expand the root fs when necessary. I'd be willing to re-install if
Read this from you link (not sure what this means):
Multiple device support. This feature is currently not supported on SUSE Linux
Enterprise Server.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Benjamin
Block
Sent: Fr
Correction:
Bootloader support for /boot, allowing to boot from a Btrfs partition
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 11:11 AM
To: 'Benjamin Block'
Cc: Linux on 390 Port
Subject: RE: Adding DASD to a btrfs
Well, I'm not marr
Well, I'm not married to this (fresh) install, but I do want to be able to
expand the root fs when necessary. I'd be willing to re-install if I can
create the root fs so that it can be (easily) expanded if necessary.
Currently I have only 1 single dasd (in use):
Disk /dev/dasdc:
cylinders
I just recently created a two member SSI using the previous 6.3 cookbook. Is
there any way to retrofit the sfs changes described in the new cookbook? I
previously set the default sfs pool name to "POOL1".
Chris Will
Systems Software
(313) 549-9729 Cell
cw...@bcbsm.com
-Original Message--
Hej Frank,
On 09:08 Thu 13 Aug , Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
> I'm new to both SLES (12 in my case) and btrfs. I just recently
> installed SLES 12 onto a 3390-9 (I had an additional 3390-9, but didn't
> see a way to combine the two into a single fs). I want to add the other
> 3390-9 to the bt
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Agblad Tore wrote:
> Anyone knows if this is possible yet ?
zEDC can be used from within Linux with the genwqe device driver.
genwqe is available in RHEL7.1 and SLES12.
Details can be found here:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/files/form/anonymous/api/library/f
Anyone knows if this is possible yet ?
As I understand it's advertised to be available, but when ?
BR /Tore
Tore Agblad
zOpen Teamleader
IT Services
Volvo Group Headquarters
Corporate Process & IT
Dept. DE94230
Assar Gabrielssons väg 9
SE-405
20 matches
Mail list logo
