On 10/09/2014 08:48 AM, roger wrote:
> Does anybody have any experience using decimal floating point libraries
> from C/C++ on Z-Linux? I have installed the libdfp1 library on
> SLES-11, but can't find any header files or documentation for its use.
> The requirement we have is for currency transa
y be
used with libstdc++
as it comes with GCC 4.5 or higher.
-Andreas-
>
> Roger
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 09:32 +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>
>> On 10/09/2014 08:48 AM, roger wrote:
>>> Does anybody have any experience using decimal floating point libraries
>
Hi,
this looks like a problem I've debugged last year:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661
I've also proposed a fix for that but unfortunately forgot to ping this after a
while:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00838.html
I'll try to get this in after GCC 6 release.
Hi,
Waite, Dick wrote:
Grand Day,
To those grand people running SLE11 on zLinux. I'm showing gcc
at 4.3.2, which means no support for the new z10 instructions and the
decimal goodies. I'm being told, SLE 11.0 was shipped with gcc 4.3.3
which does have all the goodies...
SuSE picked so
Hi,
Are there options for "gcc" or are cross-compilers available which would run
on zLinux and generate object code or modules which could be executed under
z/OS?
GCC and the GNU binutils do not support the z/OS ABI and binary format. So
currently there is no way to build z/OS executables usi
> The latest webcast was a performance comparison of z10 and z196. There
> was a suggestion that gcc fixes would be pushed upstream for -march.
> Also the IBM JVM would be updated to benefit. That might be more
> important for most people.
The Binutils and GCC support for z196 has just been applie
On 11/09/2011 08:21 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
Hi,
your cmdlines to build the shared lib look correct. The assembler code shows
that the code
has been built correctly with -fPIC. However, the relocations in the .o and .so
files look
like non-pic code. With -fPIC it should be R_390_PLT32DBL in th
Hello,
> However the chart preceding these statements indicates this:
> f0, f2, f4, f6 parameter passing and return values (volatile)
> f1, f3, f5, f7 general purpose (volatile)
> f8-f15 general purpose (saved)
The chart is correct. Older zSeries ABI documents came with the last
two (saved)/(vo
Hello,
this a known bug in glibc. For all biarch targets the utmp/utmpx/wtmp
files are shared between 32 and 64 applications. Since these files
simply consist of struct utmp size records struct utmp must be the
same in both cases. Unfortunately a struct utmp usually contains long
type value whi
Hi,
I wrote a post about how to build and test zlib also for distros currently not
supported:
http://linux-on-z.blogspot.com/2019/10/howto-exploiting-hardware-compression.html
You will find a quick one-liner test at the end of the post which can be used
to verify whether
hardware compression w
Hi,
RHEL 8 and Sles 15 do not provide 32 bit libs for S/390 anymore.
For which software do you need 32 bit support on S/390?
Andreas
On 22.07.20 03:09, Bhemidhi, Ashwin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to install 32 bit libraries (c libraries) on RHEL 8.2 and I
> could not find the rpms in th
11 matches
Mail list logo
