The Register gets it just about right
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/34734.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Ceruti, Gerard G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 January 2004 13:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MS url
>
>
> Hi People
>
> Is anyone aware of rebuttals to the d
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've lain in the bath a few times over the last few months
> (no smart remarks - usually I
> shower) and contemplated the idea of free software.
>
> I've come to the conclusion that it's inevitable and
> unavoidable, and th
> -Original Message-
> From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 September 2003 15:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SCO CEO's letter to Open Source Community
>
>
> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/09/123246.shtml?tid=187&tid=88
This all reminds me of the Red Queen from "A
> I'm not picking on you specifically, especially since you
> can't help it, but those idiots have mandated 6 lines of
> boilerplate for
> every four-line message -- 150% overhead in this case!!
Its less of an overhead than that. After all, everyone sends emails in Word
don't they, so an extra 300
Absolutely agree with you - but unable to do anything about it. The fsking
stuff is added by our mail gateway.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 July 2003 21:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SCO - more water torture
>
> Another of them bein
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Lionel Dyck wrote:
>
> > Another good article on SCO's water torture of the Linux community
> >
> > http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_27/b3840089.htm
> >
>
> Is the authour prejudging this"
> "True, SCO should be free to protect its software, in this case core
>
You can go to the standards sites (www.spec.org, www.tpc.org) to get some
idea of the processing power of these machines. You might also want to look
at the index of the world's best performing machines at www.top500.org.
However, comparison is still difficult. You will find that the top end
machi
> Microsoft really does NOT get it:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/02/25/HNimcrisis_1.html
"Greenwich (the MS IM product) will roll out with multiparty chat
capabilities, peer-to-peer voice and video conferencing, data collaboration,
authentication,
encryption, multidomain support and e-m
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Flass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 February 2003 14:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: vi vs. ISPF
> Simpler, but extremely annoying. The whole "insert" thing
> just blows my
> mind. I prefer the ISPF editor to xedit, but both are miles ahead
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> "I think most people don't want their employees using the
> source code everyday. Really, they
> don't. That's a distraction from real work," Ballmer said last year.
>
> http://212.100.234.54/content/4/28981.html
This es
> Slightly off topic , what software is the for website
> creation under Linux (> ala FrontPage) ?.
I can't think of anything as bad as FrontPage. Personally I use Xemacs with
the psgml extension. If you want to go for something that is more GUI like,
then try Quanta.
Internet communications are
> "We will beat Linux on clusters. We can't beat them on price,
> but we have to
> add value."
Can you say Wolfpack? When was the last time you heard about this?
On the other side, can you say Beowulf and are you sick of hearing about the
latest implementation?
Internet communications are not s
You may be victim of one of the classic UNIX tricks.
Create a file, open it and then delete it without closing it. What you now
have is an anonymous file, it appears in no directories but has an
associated inode. This is extremely useful where you want to create a
temporary file that will go away
> From: Paul Matthews jnr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: SlickEdit ® Announces Availability of Visual SlickEdit for
> Linux on IBM eServer zSeries
>
>
> Thought this may be of interest to some of you, probably the more
> developer orientated types will enjoy it most, but its still
> fun
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Is it as "user friendly"? No.
UNIX is user friendly - it is just very particular who its friends are.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group
does not accept legal responsibility fo
Have a look at BitKeeper. This is used for version control on the Linux
kernel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lionel Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 June 2002 17:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Clear Case
>
>
> Is there a Clearcase to CVS migration tool?
>
> --
The alternative, which we are using, is to use Samba to export the Clear
Case filesystem.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas David Rivers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 June 2002 01:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Clear Case
>
>
> Gerard Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
> From: Scott Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Look on page 2 of this article:
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,53006,00.html
>
> Unless the author (who is generall pro-opensource, based on
> his other writings)took the comments way out of context, Sun
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
