Also, make sure you don't change the filename or directory case. Windows
doesn't care it
a file is uppercase/lowercase, but Linux will.
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 09:53 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:29:29 +0400
> Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > No firewall is not
I have seen this. Just make sure the servers have enough free memory before
you start.
If the memory is being taken up by hugepages, you may not have enough for the
upgrade.
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 17:47 +, Mark Bullis wrote:
> We attempted to upgrade 4 SUSE linux z/VM 6.4 guests this
Should be able to. Just attach the FCP devices needed to the 2nd level guest.
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 12:09 +0400, Jake Anderson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to build a second level zVM using SCSI on top of a zVM which
> is built on using 3390 ?
>
> Has anyone attempted ?
>
> Jake
>
>
I would not think that the z/VM upgrade would have caused this. Has the linux
guest
worked OK in the past before the upgrade?
Have you reached out to CA?
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 18:54 +, Vitale, Joseph wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Running a CA zLinux Product called "PIM" aka
Check your FCP definitions on linux. You may find they are still referencing
your gold
system.
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 11:31 -0400, Grzegorz Powiedziuk wrote:
> Hi
> What do you mean it still mounts a gold LUN? You boot from from a NEW Lun
> but root filesystem ends up beeing mounted from
Looking back at the original post, I see he's using LOADPARM 009. Should
it be LOADPARM 0009 like in my example?
From: Karl Kingston <karlkings...@ongov.net>
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 02/15/2017 02:38 PM
Subject:Re: IPL using LOADPARM bypasses SALIPL scree
IPL cuu LOADPARM 0009 get me an SAPL screen (this is with z/VM 6.3)
From: William Norton
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 02/15/2017 02:25 PM
Subject:Re: IPL using LOADPARM bypasses SALIPL screen
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
I would not do that. Can you increase the guest machine size?You
want to be at a point where you barely swap.
From: "Beesley, Paul"
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 11/21/2016 09:35 AM
Subject:Additional SWAP recommendations
Sent by:
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 01/07/2016 08:28:52
AM:
> From: Michael Holzheu
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/07/2016 08:28 AM
> Subject: Re: hyptop question
> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
>
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016
We have an XIV connected to 2 switches which in turn is connected to our
z10 through 4 adapters.
We have defined 5 luns for use under SLES11SP2.
Right now, we are using YaST to define all of the connections. This
seems to be cumbersome.
Is there a way for us to to scan and define each lun
10 matches
Mail list logo