Re: URGENT! really low performance.

2003-02-17 Thread Peter D. Ward
y S/390 MP based upon Flex-ES on that hardware would be more Mippage than that. Peter D. Ward Fundamental Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] 734-665-3520

Re: IBM has no realistic entry-level offering in the mainframe space

2002-12-01 Thread Peter D. Ward
See interspersed below. From: Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:29:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> IBM has never demonstrated any commitment of any kind to develop a >> reasonable entry level approach to the mainframe that would capture the >> interest of

Re: OT: FlexEs, Hercules, others

2002-11-29 Thread Peter D. Ward
"db" wrote: > My exact words were "for a goodly sum." No value judgement there; noting > that it costs money. If you want to read it as a slight on Flex, then go > ahead. I don't see it that way, and I don't see the point in beating that > carrion any longer. Do some reading in Ecclesiastes for my

Re: Linux under VM on Hercules?

2002-11-27 Thread Peter D. Ward
Please see answers interspersed below. "db" wrote: > > You seem to presume: 1) the costs of a PWD-offered solution > > are predominately attributable > > to the cost of the selected mainframe virtual machine, and 2) > > there is no reason for IBM's > > management to prefer one solution over ano

Re: Linux under VM on Hercules?

2002-11-26 Thread Peter D. Ward
David, You seem to presume: 1) the costs of a PWD-offered solution are predominately attributable to the cost of the selected mainframe virtual machine, and 2) there is no reason for IBM's management to prefer one solution over another, and 3) that the solutions are exchangable. My belief is

Re: Linux under VM on Hercules?

2002-11-25 Thread Peter D. Ward
Details of that offering and server equivalents can be found at: http://www.developer.ibm.com/welcome/s390/netfefs.html Click through on the authorized reseller links for specifics and contact info. Peter D. Ward Fundamental Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] 734-665-3520 > Date:Mon, 25 No

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-19 Thread Peter D. Ward
John Summerfield wrote: > > > The principle being what exactly? > > Cheap licences for single-seat users. Allows folk to offload > development from the mainframe. Some time ago I did some programming > work. The tools I needed were TSO & ISPF (or equivalent), Pl/1, IMS, > REXX and the application

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-18 Thread Peter D. Ward
> > John Summerfield wrote: > > > > > how many > > > corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set > > > of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities? > > > > How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number? > > Pick a number. If you have a be

Re: OK who messed with the redbook?

2002-04-18 Thread Peter D. Ward
John Summerfield wrote: > how many > corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set > of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities? How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number?