Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit performance & resource consumption?

2013-03-27 Thread Richard Troth
>From a life-cycle management perspective, do what David said and go 64-bit. >From a performance perspective, build both and MEASURE the results. (Of course, you'll be running on a 64-bit kernel in most cases, so getting a pure sample will be tricky.) On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Andrew Po

Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit performance & resource consumption?

2013-03-27 Thread David Boyes
> What is the situation with modern Z 9/10 hardware: should we change our > scripts to build 64-bit or stay with 32-bit? The app is relatively small - > let's say > 1.5 Mb of memory for a resident set and modest CPU consumption - but a > fully loaded customer configuration may have hundreds of ins

32-bit vs. 64-bit performance & resource consumption?

2013-03-27 Thread Andrew Porter
We have a product one of whose components is written in C; on Intel Linux we've always built just 32-bit apps for both 32-bit & 64-bit systems because there is little if any penalty for running a 32-bit app on a 64-bit system. Other hardware differs: Itanium for instance, when we supported HP-UX