> If I use HyperSocket, do SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate
> via z/VMs(z/VM-A, z/VM-B)?
> Or SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate directly?(not via
> z/VMs)
It depends on how you set up the connections.
You can connect the Linux guests directly to the hipersocket, but there
is a
limit to the number of
The Hipersocket is for communicating between LPARs. You would set up a
Hipersocket interface for any SLES9 image that needs to communicate with
a SLES9 image in the other LPAR. It will work for z/VM-a to z/VM-b also.
The VSwitch is for communicating between virtual machines and the
outside world.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:19:34 +0900, mainframe_s390
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use HyperSocket, do SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate
> via z/VMs(z/VM-A, z/VM-B)?
> Or SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate directly?(not via
> z/VMs)
To be fair, with just 2 Linux servers per z/VM it would not matter
Thank you for answers.
Please teach me again.
If I use HyperSocket, do SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate
via z/VMs(z/VM-A, z/VM-B)?
Or SLES9-A and SLES9-B communicate directly?(not via
z/VMs)
Thank you.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Upgrade Y
Behalf Of mainframe_s390
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 8:59 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: 4 SLES9s running on 2 z/VMs.
>
>
> Hi,all
>
> Please teach me.
> 2 SLES9s(SLES9-A and SLES9-B) running on z/VM V5.1(z/VM-A)
> in a LPAR(A).
> The other LPAR(LPAR(B)) has the
You must use Hipersockets to communicate between LPARs. To communicate
between virtual machines running under the same z/VM, it is better to
use the VSwitch.
mainframe_s390 wrote:
Hi,all
Please teach me.
2 SLES9s(SLES9-A and SLES9-B) running on z/VM V5.1(z/VM-A)
in a LPAR(A).
The other LPAR(LPAR(B
Hi,all
Please teach me.
2 SLES9s(SLES9-A and SLES9-B) running on z/VM V5.1(z/VM-A)
in a LPAR(A).
The other LPAR(LPAR(B)) has the same configration.
(SLES9-C and SLES9-D running on z/VM-B)
What I want to do is to communicate between SLES9-A and
SLES9-C.
Should I use G
