On Thursday, 04/17/2008 at 09:23 EDT, "Grasso, M. - SPLXM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, my management would like to see "money saving" arguments before
> allowing an investigation.
This is where I think things will start to fall apart.
If you have already invested in a CMS-based monitori
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Grasso, M. - SPLXM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, my management would like to see "money saving" arguments before
> allowing an investigation.
That's going to be a tough one. CMS is highly efficient for the
typical systems management tasks that people do
On Thursday, 04/17/2008 at 09:41 EDT, Scott Rohling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure there are lots more ideas out there about how to use Linux
rather
> than CMS for 'service machines' as we used to call them..
Use Linux AF_IUCV sockets to connect to *MSG.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM
Where you may get hung up here is debating what 'belongs' on CMS and what
belongs on Linux. Usually that's answered by how much bending over
backwards you do (the goal is none).
You can do much from Linux that you otherwise did on CMS. With root
authority - you can use the 'vmcp' command to iss
Hello Everyone,
I would like to access your hands-on knowledge in regards to replacing
z/VM CMS users with Linux VMs.
I work in a TPF shop which primarily uses z/VM to support its TPF/VPARS
test systems. We are currently running z/VM5.3.
After much resistance, Linux is now officially in
