Most weird. At least to me. Well, I guess it is possible to use a BASH script
where most would use C code. But a trade secret that you distribute in source
form?
http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/308/1/
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
I always thought that once something you protect via the Trade Secret
method of intellectual property protection is legally exposed to the
public that protection is from then on irrevocably lost.
Mark Jacobs
On 08/17/11 10:48, McKown, John wrote:
Most weird. At least to me. Well, I guess it is
Yeah - very strange... 'copyright' - ok. Trade secret in a glass jar?
no.. by definition, not a secret.
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:48 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
Most weird. At least to me. Well, I guess it is possible to use a BASH
script where
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, McKown, John wrote:
Most weird. At least to me. Well, I guess it is possible to
use a BASH script where most would use C code. But a trade
secret that you distribute in source form?
http://www.clustermonkey.net//content/view/308/1/
It is a footnote, buried down in the
On 8/17/2011 at 10:48 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
wrote:
Most weird. At least to me. Well, I guess it is possible to use a BASH script
where most would use C code. But a trade secret that you distribute in
source form?
