FW: SLES 10 SP2 upgrade to SLES 10 SP3 error

2010-01-06 Thread Slaughter, Dale
The directories existing before the mount makes sense, and explains what I'm seeing. Thanks to everyone that replied - I've learned some things! Output of lsdasd, 0202 was the old /usr, 0208 is the new /usr 0.0.0200(ECKD) at ( 94: 0) is dasda : n/f 0.0.0201(ECKD) at ( 94: 4) is dasdb

FW: SLES 10 SP2 upgrade to SLES 10 SP3 error

2010-01-06 Thread Slaughter, Dale
Thanks to everyone who's replied. I followed the process that was sent in http://www.linuxvm.org/Info/HOWTOs/movefs.html with the following deviation: I had already used yast to activate and format the disk as ReiserFS, and assigned it a mountpoint of /usrnew. I've followed steps 4 and 5

Re: FW: SLES 10 SP2 upgrade to SLES 10 SP3 error

2010-01-06 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 1/6/2010 at 12:26 PM, "Slaughter, Dale" wrote: > After using "tar" command, the "diff" command showed the below messages > - I suspect they are OK? Yes. If you look at the files being complained about, you'll find they are broken symbolic links. The tar command doesn't care about the

FW: SLES 10 SP2 upgrade to SLES 10 SP3 error

2010-01-06 Thread Slaughter, Dale
After using "tar" command, the "diff" command showed the below messages - I suspect they are OK? I didn't do the "mount" "umount" commands since I had already updated fstab with the new disk and rebooted. The "df -h" command does now show that the two files are both at 1.9G, vs. there being 0.2G

FW: SLES 10 SP2 upgrade to SLES 10 SP3 error

2010-01-06 Thread Slaughter, Dale
To increase the size of /usr, the VM guys have added a disk for me, which has been formatted and mounted as /usrnew. I then ran the command "cp -Rv --preserve /usr/* /usrnew" as root from the "/" directory'. However, the USED space is different - 1.9G for /usr and 2.1G for /usrnew. I've looked on