Re: Fw: [LINUX-390] Swap partition "filling up" on RHEL4 - NOT

2006-08-30 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 8/30/06, John Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The hell of it is that I *don't* have a zSeries-- or even an instance within z/VM-- where I can run Linux, so I can only do some speculation. Yes, and that is where it makes a difference. On discrete servers it may make sense to tune your co

Fw: [LINUX-390] Swap partition "filling up" on RHEL4 - NOT

2006-08-30 Thread John Campbell
Ken Hall said: > I tracked down a copy of the actual report from the performance guy, > and it turns out we've been (partially) barking up the wrong tree. > Sorry for the confusion. > > The real story is that the large swap partition DEVICE was 100% BUSY > during part of the test. The original sum