>> I intend to write up something if I can ever get it to work the same
way twice without futzing with it.
...
> Maybe Mike M. can make us a cookbook :)
Doubtful :(( I'm in over my head trying to wrap up the latest version.
"Global file systems on System z Linux" would be a good
redpaper/whitepap
OTOH, you don't have to migrate at all. As Leland points out, there IS a choice
now. 8-)
Leland, I'd say it's a religious issue. Both work fairly well for local
clusters.
If you have, or want to, standardized on RH, GFS gets a lot more love (via
SNA's High Availability Option for RHEL on Syste
S2 or OCFS2 on SLES11 SP3
On 7/11/2013 2:41 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Under z/VM right?
>
> OCFS2 is pretty simple if the amount of space you need fits on a minidisk.
>
> If you need cLVM, it's complicated.
> The HAE guide helps some, but doesn't really put it into cook bo
On 7/11/2013 2:41 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Under z/VM right?
OCFS2 is pretty simple if the amount of space you need fits on a minidisk.
If you need cLVM, it's complicated.
The HAE guide helps some, but doesn't really put it into cook book format.
It's like a layer cake and you have to each la
On 7/11/2013 2:21 PM, Mark Post wrote:
On 7/11/2013 at 03:07 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
Now that we have a choice, anyone have any pros/cons that they'd like to
share?
I would say the biggest thing to consider is this item from the SLE-ha-guide:
Read-only GFS2 Support
For easier migration from
ehalf Of Leland
Lucius
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:08 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] GFS2 or OCFS2 on SLES11 SP3
Now that we have a choice, anyone have any pros/cons that they'd like to share?
My first attempt at using OCFS2 in an active/active DRDB-backed 4-node clu
>>> On 7/11/2013 at 03:07 PM, Leland Lucius wrote:
> Now that we have a choice, anyone have any pros/cons that they'd like to
> share?
I would say the biggest thing to consider is this item from the SLE-ha-guide:
Read-only GFS2 Support
For easier migration from GFS2 to OCFS2, you can mount your
Now that we have a choice, anyone have any pros/cons that they'd like to
share?
My first attempt at using OCFS2 in an active/active DRDB-backed 4-node
cluster didn't pan out too well. But, I would have to say it wasn't
necessarily OCFS2s fault...more like me struggling to get fencing
working pro
