Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Jason W. Strnad
I second that. I earned several grey hairs working out how to keep a certain unamed online service providers ppp-like tunnels both up and useful over a big MPLS backbone. The results of such tunneling is *very* sensitive to *common* (and otherwise harmless) network issues. -jasons Alan Cox wro

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 01:36, John Summerfield wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 05:38, you wrote: > > Adding ppp support and a few small > > scripts, and you've got a really nice VPN server...8-) > > > There's a nitfy example of using ppp over ssh in the pppd > documentation/samples. Take a look. Bad

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 05:38, you wrote: > Adding ppp support and a few small > scripts, and you've got a really nice VPN server...8-) There's a nitfy example of using ppp over ssh in the pppd documentation/samples. Take a look. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread David Boyes
> 1. What are the benefits of using Linux for these "gateways" > instead of just > using z/VM TCPIP itself? Traffic management and filtering capabilities, primarily. The z/VM stack is faster, but the Linux stack is much more flexible in terms of being able to handle packet filters, routing,

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Post, Mark K
Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions In a message dated 9/9/2002 10:20:37 AM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Be warned--at least one recent revision of the QDIO

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 9/9/2002 10:20:37 AM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Be warned--at least one recent revision of the QDIO drivers used the > FASTPATH (or some such) option, which meant it was incompatible with > filtering. I don't know whether IBM has fixed this yet. > Do

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:51:59AM -0400, Dave Myers wrote: > 1. What are the benefits of using Linux for these "gateways" instead of just > using z/VM TCPIP itself? Possibly a little less raw speed (haven't seen a thorough analysis yet); however you gain easy access to the network filtering

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Post, Mark K
ating more than a few of these images. I believe zebra is commonly mentioned for Linux/390 dynamic routing. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

Re: H50 sandbox - followup questions

2002-09-09 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 9/5/2002 10:23:12 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Given that scenario, what network setup would make more sense? > > If you have a bigger machine than a H50, use the Linux systems in > separate LPARs to isolate the router from the OSes it is routing.