T.EDU
Subject: Re: LVM Question
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.gov>,
"Walters, Gene P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I see when I do the PVSCAN
>
> pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a whi
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Walters, Gene P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I see when I do the PVSCAN
>
> pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
> pvscan -- ACTIVE PV "/dev/dasdc1" of VG "oraclevg" [2.29 GB / 0 fre
e PV "/dev/dasdl1" of VG "oraclevg" [6.87 GB / 6.87 GB
free]
pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/dasdm1" is in no VG [6.88 GB]
pvscan -- total: 7 [34.39 GB] / in use: 6 [27.51 GB] / in no VG: 1 [6.88
GB]
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PR
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Walters, Gene P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a pvscan, and it shows that I have 4 active and 3 inactive PV's
> that belong to volume group oraclevg. My question is, how does a PV
> become inactive, and is it really in m
I did a pvscan, and it shows that I have 4 active and 3 inactive PV's
that belong to volume group oraclevg. My question is, how does a PV
become inactive, and is it really in my VG if it says inactive?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
Everything except /boot is in the LVM. That's the way the install set it up
and I didn't bother to change it. Next time I'll know better!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/22/2006 11:57 AM >>>
From: Richard Pinion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am running Centos 4.3 under Hercules, kernel 2.6.9. I recompiled
From: Richard Pinion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am running Centos 4.3 under Hercules, kernel 2.6.9. I recompiled the
> kernel source and installed it. I forgot to do the zipl command. Now my
> image fails during boot. Luckily I backed up the Hercules disk images before
> any of my changes. I
I am running Centos 4.3 under Hercules, kernel 2.6.9. I recompiled the kernel
source and installed it. I forgot to do the zipl command. Now my image fails
during boot. Luckily I backed up the Hercules disk images before any of my
changes. I have re-ipled using the good images. I would like
just fine on ext3 file systems as well.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo
Rivera
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:14 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LVM Question
I'm sorry, I forgot the main step, before you
X-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
a.es> Subject: LVM Question
Sent by: Linux on
a.es> Subject: LVM Question
Sent by: Linux on
390 Port
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have currently a database in a filesystem located in a DASD. I would
like to add 2 more DASD to this filesystem using LVM.
Do I have to erase previously all the data in my first DASD ? or does
this disk enhancement respect the previously existing data ?
Saludos,
José Raúl Barón
Dpto. Si
> Is there some magic now that I need to perform to make this permanent? What
>should be my next step?
Compare the output of lsmod both before and after the reboot. Unless you ran
mk_initrd after the LVM modules were loaded it's very likely that they aren't
included in your initrd and, consequent
53, 2 Nov 4 13:03 system-home
> brw--- 1 root root 253, 1 Nov 4 13:03 system-opt
> brw--- 1 root root 253, 0 Nov 4 13:03 system-var
> brw--- 1 root root 253, 3 Dec 8 09:07 usrdata-srv
Is there some magic now that I need to perform to make this permane
techlnux:~ # ls -l /dev/usrdata
-Original Message-
From: Mark Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LVM question
Ok, this looks like a difference between LVM and the LVM2 that comes with
2.6. I guess "vgdisplay&qu
Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LVM question
I crossed up too many systems trying to get this to work and I had to
restore from backups.
I then ran "pvscan" sans quotes
> techlnux:/proc # pvscan
> PV /dev/dasdc1 VG system lvm
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LVM question
What does the output of "cat /proc/lvm/global" show you?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
What does the output of "cat /proc/lvm/global" show you?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LVM question
SLES9 for S/390 (31-bit)
SLES9 for S/390 (31-bit) in an LPAR > (no VM) using a shared IFL
I must be missing something -- but things may be different under SLES9
Currently I have /srv filesytem under root. I would like to "/srv" under
LVM.
I keep getting an error during the IPL stating "/sbin/fsck.reiserfs /srv
failed o
Hi,
I am trying to extend an existing lvm and it is failing. I seem to be
getting conflicting info on the status of things -
pvcreate -v /dev/dasdk1
pvcreate -- locking logical volume manager
pvcreate -- checking physical volume name "/dev/dasdk1"
pvcreate -- getting physical volume size
pvcreat
I am trying to extend an existing lvm and it is failing. I seem to be
getting conflicting info on the status of things -
pvcreate -v /dev/dasdk1
pvcreate -- locking logical volume manager
pvcreate -- checking physical volume name "/dev/dasdk1"
pvcreate -- getting physical volume size
pvcreate --
be 10
stripes.
We have some very large LV's that are 29 stripes. Seems to work fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Vic
> Cross
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
G'day Dave,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Dave MYERS wrote:
> I tried using more mod 9's...but kept getting the same msg.
> The only way it would let me build this 100gb filesystem was with STRIPE=1.
What value(s) did you use for stripe? I have seen someplace (and it makes
sense to me, and indeed has wo
Last week I was creating some 100gb LVM filesystems on SLES8 SP2
using 3390-9's.
I wanted to STRIPE (greater than 1) , but LVM kept telling me that I did
not
have enough space.
I tried using more mod 9's...but kept getting the same msg.
The only way it would let me build this 100gb filesystem was
Don't know what happened to my earlier reply, but I told him he needed to
create a logical volume as well as the volume group.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LVM que
D]
Subject: Re: LVM question
Thanks Josh! That is what I needed to do.
Mark, I rebooted just because! I wanted to see
if it really was there and how the messages
changed at start up. Newbie learning I guess.
It was pretty clear to me that I didn't need to
reboot from the stuff in the distri
Thanks Josh! That is what I needed to do.
Mark, I rebooted just because! I wanted to see
if it really was there and how the messages
changed at start up. Newbie learning I guess.
It was pretty clear to me that I didn't need to
reboot from the stuff in the distributions
redbook.
__
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LVM question
I've been trying to search through the archives, but it
never comes back to me so I'll ask here (sorry, I'm
sure this has been asked before).
I'm trying to use LVM for the first time. I'm running
SuSE 2.4 kernel. So I created m
I've been trying to search through the archives, but it
never comes back to me so I'll ask here (sorry, I'm
sure this has been asked before).
I'm trying to use LVM for the first time. I'm running
SuSE 2.4 kernel. So I created my 2 minidisks,
dasdfmt 'd them, fdasd'd them, went into Yast an
29 matches
Mail list logo
