A quick amendment:
On 10/21/10 1:53 PM, Patrick Spinler wrote:
> On 10/21/10 1:40 PM, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote:
>>
>> Don't define the MDISKs to both be writable filesystems on each guest,
>> because
>> that risks corrupting the filesystems. Use NFS instead.
>>
>> (snip good followup explanation
On 10/21/10 1:40 PM, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote:
>
> Don't define the MDISKs to both be writable filesystems on each guest, because
> that risks corrupting the filesystems. Use NFS instead.
>
> (snip good followup explanation)
You could in theory and with some amount of trouble, set up a cluster
fi
Linux on 390 Port
>
> 10/21/2010 02:40 PM
>
> Please respond to
> Linux on 390 Port
>
> To
>
> LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: Linux Shared DASD
>
> On Thursday, October 21, 2010 02:07:39 pm you wrote:
> > Hello,
> &g
On Thursday, October 21, 2010 02:07:39 pm you wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a requirement to share (read/write) a set of files (XML) between two
> zLinux guests under the same zVM LPAR.
> The zLinux guests will run WebSphere and update the same set of files.
> Can I define an mdisk as "MWV" and allow th
Hello,
I have a requirement to share (read/write) a set of files (XML) between two
zLinux guests under the same zVM LPAR.
The zLinux guests will run WebSphere and update the same set of files.
Can I define an mdisk as "MWV" and allow the zLinux guests to share?
Or would it be prudent to setup somet
