>>> On 8/30/2016 at 10:57 AM, Marcy Cortes
>>> wrote:
> Does anyone else think that's a problem that its doing that by default?
That rule was originally added to fix a problem in the Intel/AMD world. That
doesn't mean it should be applied to all architectures. Hint.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:00 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Offline/STANDBY memory - Linux vs z/VM
>>> On 8/30/2016 at 10:57 AM, Marcy Cortes
>&g
n 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Mohammad
Zachariah
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 4:59 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Offline/STANDBY memory - Linux vs z/VM
New systemd (I think starting from systemd-219-19) will online/consume standby
memory duri
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Mohammad Zachariah wrote:
>
> New systemd (I think starting from systemd-219-19) will online/consume
> standby memory during startup. Commenting out udev memory hotadd rule is
> not enough.
These rules (cpu + memory) seem to be only available for distribut
Egypt
From: Heiko Carstens
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 08/30/2016 01:24 PM
Subject:Re: Offline/STANDBY memory - Linux vs z/VM
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
On
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:23:50AM -0400, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> > Hmmm... a difference of exactly 512MB.
> That's two chunks, since a chunk is 256 MB.
>
> I hard rebooted and this time Linux took three extra chunks: (just can't
> keep his hands out of the cookie jar :))
>
> # zruncommand linu
> Hmmm... a difference of exactly 512MB.
That's two chunks, since a chunk is 256 MB.
I hard rebooted and this time Linux took three extra chunks: (just can't
keep his hands out of the cookie jar :))
# zruncommand linux255 lsmem
Address Range Size (MB) StateRemovabl
>>> On 8/29/2016 at 05:53 PM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> Maybe it could succeed by default, and I could add a '--anal-retentive'
> flag if someone wants the exact amount of memory. (he he)
And when the system administrator realizes [s]he didn't get as much memory as
they asked for (with a good r
Mark,
Maybe it could succeed by default, and I could add a '--anal-retentive'
flag if someone wants the exact amount of memory. (he he)
-Mike
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 8/29/2016 at 05:03 PM, Michael MacIsaac
> wrote:
> > VM thinks there is 7G of STANDBY, b
>>> On 8/29/2016 at 05:03 PM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> VM thinks there is 7G of STANDBY, but Linux seems to have taken a bit more.
> So if the user tries to add 7G, that can be done in the user directory, but
> in Linux only 6.5G or so can be added.
>
> Would it be better to just add all that's
One more question under the Principle of Least Astonishment. You have a
virtual machine with an initial of 1G and a STANDBY of 7G. So you can add
another 7G, right? Well yes for VM, but sorry, no for Linux:
# zqdirentry linux255 | grep STORAGE
COMMAND DEFINE STORAGE 1G STANDBY 7G
# zruncomman
11 matches
Mail list logo
